13. K modeling#

13.1. Characteristics of modeling#

Compression - traction with the law parameter GLRC_DM: ALPHA_C =100.

\(\mathrm{A6}\)

_images/1000000000000320000001E18AA1E5624797F771.jpg

Figure 13.1-a: mesh and boundary conditions.

Modeling: DKTG

Boundary conditions:

  • Embedding in \({A}_{1}\);

  • \(\mathrm{DX}=0.0\) and \(\mathrm{DRY}=0.0\) on the \({A}_{1}-{A}_{3}\) edge;

  • \(\mathrm{DX}={U}_{0}\times f(t)\) on the \({A}_{2}-{A}_{4}\) edge;

where \({U}_{0}=2.0\times {10}^{-3}m\) and \(f(t)\) represent the amplitude of cyclic loading as a function of the (pseudo-time) parameter \(t\). To properly verify the model, a loading cycle is considered as follows:

_images/10000000000001F800000120B23CA7090775C644.png

Figure 13.1-b: Load function \(f(t)\).

13.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

Number of knots: 9 Number of stitches: 8 TRIA3; 8 SEG2.

13.3. Tested values and results#

The average reaction forces along the axis \(\mathrm{Ox}\) and the average displacements along the axis \(\mathrm{Oy}\) en \(\mathrm{A2}-\mathrm{A4}\) obtained by multi-layer modeling (reference) and by that based on the model GLRC_DM are compared, in terms of relative differences; the tolerance is taken as an absolute value on these relative differences; the tolerance is taken as an absolute value on these relative differences:

Identification

Reference type

Reference value

Tolerance

Dissipation at \(t=\mathrm{0,05}\)

ANALYTIQUE

0

5 10-2

Dissipation at \(t=\mathrm{0,75}\)

NON_REGRESSION

254.9756

5 10-2

Dissipation at \(t=1\)

NON_REGRESSION

346.5721

5 10-2

COMPRESSION \(t=\mathrm{0,25}\)

Relative difference in forces \(\mathrm{FX}\)

NON_REGRESSION

4.046337 105

5 10-2

Relative difference in displacement \(\mathrm{DY}\)

ANALYTIQUE

0

5 10-2

COMPRESSION \(t=\mathrm{1,0}\)

Relative difference in forces \(\mathrm{FX}\)

NON_REGRESSION

5.204660 105

5 10-2

Relative difference in movement \(\mathrm{DY}\)

ANALYTIQUE

0

0.1

COMPRESSION \(t=\mathrm{1,5}\)

Relative difference in forces \(\mathrm{FX}\)

NON_REGRESSION

-2.687820 106

5 10-2

Relative difference in movement \(\mathrm{DY}\)

ANALYTIQUE

0

0.1

TRACTION \(t=\mathrm{3,0}\)

Relative difference in forces \(\mathrm{FX}\)

NON_REGRESSION

-4.175743 106

5 10-2

Relative difference in movement \(\mathrm{DY}\)

ANALYTIQUE

0

0.1

TRACTION \(t=\mathrm{3,5}\)

Relative difference in forces \(\mathrm{FX}\)

NON_REGRESSION

-2.087571 106

5 10-2

Relative difference in movement \(\mathrm{DY}\)

ANALYTIQUE

0

0.1