14. G modeling results#
14.1. Tested values#
Identification |
Reference |
Type |
Tolerance |
Loading 1 |
|||
Normal contact force |
2.0784E+05N |
ANALYTIQUE |
|
Tangential contact force |
-1.2000E+05 N |
ANALYTIQUE |
|
DX (point A) |
1,000 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point A) |
—1,732 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DX (point B) |
1,000 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point B) |
—1,732 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DX (point C) |
1,000 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point C) |
—1,732 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DX (point D) |
1,000 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point D) |
—1,732 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
Loading 2 |
|||
Normal contact force |
1, 722E+05N |
ANALYTIQUE |
|
Tangential contact force |
—1.8173E+05N |
ANALYTIQUE |
|
DX (dot A) |
1,000 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point A) |
—1,732 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DX (point B) |
1,000 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point B) |
—1,732 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DX (point C) |
1,000 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point C) |
—1,732 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DX (point D) |
1,000 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point D) |
—1,732 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
Loading 3 |
|||
Normal contact force |
1, 71486E+05N |
ANALYTIQUE |
|
Tangential contact force |
—1, 82977E+05N |
ANALYTIQUE |
|
DX (point A) |
8.794mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point A) |
2.768mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DX (point B) |
8.794mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point B) |
2.768mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DX (point C) |
8.794mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point C) |
2.768mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DX (point D) |
8.794mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
DY (point D) |
2.768 mm |
NON_REGRESSION |
|
14.2. note#
In this case, the game is defined geometrically. The results are less good than those obtained with the penalty for friction alone. In addition, this method is more time consuming.