8. Results of the D modeling#

8.1. Tested values#

Identification

Reference

Type

Tolerance

Loading 1

Normal contact force

1.200E+04 N

ANALYTIQUE

RELATIF — 5.00%

Tangential contact force

0 N

ANALYTIQUE

ABSOLU — 5.00%

DX (point A)

1,000 mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 1.00%

DY (point A)

—1,732 mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 1.00%

DX (point B)

1,000 mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 1.00%

DY (point B)

—1,732 mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 1.00%

Loading 2

Normal contact force

1.200E+04 N

ANALYTIQUE

RELATIF — 5.00%

Tangential contact force

—3.564E+03N

ANALYTIQUE

RELATIF — 5.00%

DX (point A)

1,000 mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 2, 60%

DY (point A)

—1,732 mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 1.00%

DX (point B)

1,000 mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 1.00%

DY (point B)

—1,732 mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 1.00%

Loading 3

Normal contact force

1.200E+04 N

ANALYTIQUE

RELATIF — 5.00%

Tangential contact force

—3,624E+03N

ANALYTIQUE

RELATIF — 5.00%

DX (point A)

8.787mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 1.00%

DY (point A)

2.768mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 1.00%

DX (point B)

8.787mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 1.00%

DY (point B)

2.768mm

NON_REGRESSION

RELATIF — 1.00%

8.2. note#

In this case, the game is defined geometrically. We can define it using the keywords DIST_1 and DIST_2. After checking, this second case does not change the result in any way.