Results of the D modeling
==============================


Tested values
---------------


.. csv-table::

    "**Identification**", "**Reference**", "Type", "Tolerance"
    "**Loading 1**", "", ""
    "Normal contact force", "1.200E+04 N", "ANALYTIQUE "," RELATIF — 5.00%"
    "Tangential contact force", "0 N", "ANALYTIQUE "," ABSOLU — 5.00%"
    "DX (point A)", "1,000 mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 1.00%"
    "DY (point A)", "—1,732 mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 1.00%"
    "DX (point B)", "1,000 mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 1.00%"
    "DY (point B)", "—1,732 mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 1.00%"
    "**Loading 2**", "", ""
    "Normal contact force", "1.200E+04 N", "ANALYTIQUE "," RELATIF — 5.00%"
    "Tangential contact force", "—3.564E+03N", "ANALYTIQUE "," RELATIF — 5.00%"
    "DX (point A)", "1,000 mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 2, 60%"
    "DY (point A)", "—1,732 mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 1.00%"
    "DX (point B)", "1,000 mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 1.00%"
    "DY (point B)", "—1,732 mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 1.00%"
    "**Loading 3**", "", ""
    "Normal contact force", "1.200E+04 N", "ANALYTIQUE "," RELATIF — 5.00%"
    "Tangential contact force", "—3,624E+03N", "ANALYTIQUE "," RELATIF — 5.00%"
    "DX (point A)", "8.787mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 1.00%"
    "DY (point A)", "2.768mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 1.00%"
    "DX (point B)", "8.787mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 1.00%"
    "DY (point B)", "2.768mm", "NON_REGRESSION "," RELATIF — 1.00%"



note
--------

In this case, the game is defined geometrically. We can define it using the keywords DIST_1 and DIST_2. After checking, this second case does not change the result in any way.