10. H modeling#
10.1. Characteristics of modeling#
It is the same modeling as the F model, but in 3D. The junctions are constructed in the same way.
10.2. Characteristics of the mesh#
The mesh, identical to that of modeling C, is represented in FIG. 5.2-a.
10.3. Tested sizes and results#
The movements at the level of the crack lips are tested after having carried out the post-treatment operations relating to \(\text{X-FEM}\) (POST_MAIL_XFEM and POST_CHAM_XFEM). The DX displacement should follow function \({u}_{x}\) in equation 2.2-7. The displacement DY should follow function \({u}_{y}\) in equation 2.2-8. The DZ displacement should follow function \({u}_{z}\) in equation 2.2-9.
Identification |
Reference |
% tolerance |
5.0 |
|
DEPZON_1 |
DX- \({u}_{x}\) |
MIN |
0 |
|
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
||
DY- \({u}_{y}\) |
MIN |
0 |
5.0 |
|
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
||
DZ- \({u}_{z}\) |
MIN |
0 |
5.0 |
|
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
||
DEPZON_2 |
DX- \({u}_{x}\) |
MIN |
0 |
5.0 |
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
||
DY- \({u}_{y}\) |
MIN |
0 |
5.0 |
|
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
||
DZ- \({u}_{z}\) |
MIN |
0 |
5.0 |
|
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
||
DEPZON_3 |
DX- \({u}_{x}\) |
MIN |
0 |
5.0 |
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
||
DY- \({u}_{y}\) |
MIN |
0 |
5.0 |
|
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
||
DZ- \({u}_{z}\) |
MIN |
0 |
5.0 |
|
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
||
DEPZON_4 |
DX- \({u}_{x}\) |
MIN |
0 |
5.0 |
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
||
DY- \({u}_{y}\) |
MIN |
0 |
5.0 |
|
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
||
DZ- \({u}_{z}\) |
MIN |
0 |
5.0 |
|
MAX |
0 |
5.0 |
Table 10.3-1
The deformation is shown in Figure 10.4-a.

Figure 10.4-a: Deformed structure (Exaggeration 10).
We test the value of \({E}^{e}\) produced by the POST_ERREUR operator (expressed in \(\text{J}\)).
Identification |
Reference type |
Reference value |
Ee |
“ANALYTIQUE” |
2, 2106 |
We test the value of \({\Vert u\Vert }_{{L}^{2}}\) produced by the POST_ERREUR operator.
10.4. notes#
The remarks are identical to those specified for the F model.