5. C modeling#

5.1. Characteristics of modeling#

_images/Object_8.png

5.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

Number of knots: 11

Number of meshes and type: 10 SEG2

5.3. Tested sizes and results#

5.3.1. Tested values#

The calculation strategy used is divided into two steps:

      • Imposed load: a disruptive load of \(1\mathrm{/}1000\) of the critical load following \(X\) is imposed to reveal the buckling mode. This load is applied for \(P\mathrm{/}{P}_{\mathit{cr}}\mathrm{=}0.98\) and up to \(P\mathrm{/}{P}_{\mathit{cr}}\mathrm{=}1.015\).

      • Imposed displacement: clear of 1.01, the structure has become very flexible, an increase in displacement DZ is imposed (option DDL_IMPO in STAT_NON_LINE) to determine the post-buckling behavior.

      • The results are in good agreement with the reference solution starting at ETA_PILOTAGE = 1.293. Before this value, the disturbing load (necessary to obtain buckling) degrades the solution, and the differences with the analytical solutions are significant (up to 80%). The corresponding values are subject to non-regression tests. But this difference is only linked to the disturbing load, since by increasing the vertical loading, we find the right solution.

DZ

Identification

Instants

Reference

—0.22

XX

1.18684

0.3595

DZ

1.18684

—0.22

ETA_PILOTAGE

1.18684

1.293

MYY

1.18684

519.41

—0.3255

XX

1.24521

0.396

DZ

1.24521

—0.3255

ETA_PILOTAGE

1.24521

1.518

MYY

1.24521

674.3

—0.4385

XX

1.30521

0.4015

DZ

1.30521

—0.4385

ETA_PILOTAGE

1.30521

1.884

MYY

1.30521

849.74

_images/1000020000000301000002430858321DB7A91A8B.png _images/100002000000030100000245C6474CB9ED4E7261.png
  • In addition, we test the value of the support reactions at the initial moment in order to validate the consideration of TYPE_CHARGE =” FIXE_PILO “in CALC_CHAMP/EXCIT when reuse is absent.

Identification

Reference value

Reference type

Tolerance

Field REAC_NODA, NodeN1, DZ Component

“ANALYTIQUE”

1E-3