6. D modeling#

6.1. Characteristics of modeling#

Incompressible AXI elements (TRIA6 + QUAD8)

_images/1000125A00002D7A00000E0E17035B052F36D7EF.svg

For the purposes of stripping, the nodes are defined:

  • \(\mathrm{NOEUMIA}=A+(0.0.01/4)\) where the deformations and stresses are the same as in \(A\)

  • \(\mathrm{NOEUMIB}=B+(0.0.01/4)\) where the deformations and stresses are the same as in \(B\)

Boundary conditions:

DDL_IMPO = GROUP_NO =' FACSUP ', DY = 0 :math:`y=0.1`

GROUP_NO =” FACINF “, DY = 0 \(y=0\)

PRES_REP = GROUP_MA =” FACEAE “, PRES = 60 sided \(\mathrm{AE}\)

6.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

Number of knots: 175.

Number of meshes and types: 20 QUAD8, 40 TRIA6.

6.3. Tested sizes and results#

Results at point \(A\):

  • first column AXIS_INCO_UPG without imposing \(\mathrm{GONF}=0\)

  • second column AXIS_INCO_UPG by imposing \(\mathrm{GONF}=0\)

  • third column AXIS_INCO_UP with quadratic mesh

  • fourth column AXIS_INCO_UP with linear mesh

  • fifth column AXIS_INCO_UPO with linear elements

Identification

Reference type

Reference value

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

\(u\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

  1. 10 -5

0.10%

0.10%

0.10%

0.10%

0.10%

\(v\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{xx}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

—60.

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

0.70%

1.50%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{yy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

03/20/12

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

1.00%

9.00%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{zz}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

6.00%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{xy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

10-5

0.01

10-5

0.08

0.2

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{xx}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

-6. 10-4

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

0.60%

0.60%

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{yy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{xy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eq}}\) - INVA_2

“ANALYTIQUE”

6.92 10-4

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

3.0%

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eq}}\) - PRIN_1

“ANALYTIQUE”

—6. 10-4

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

1.00%

6.0%

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eq}}\) - PRIN_2

“ANALYTIQUE”

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eq}}\) - PRIN_3

“ANALYTIQUE”

  1. 10-4

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

0.60%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{eq}}\) - VMIS

“ANALYTIQUE”

138.56

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

3.00%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{eq}}\) - TRESCA

“ANALYTIQUE”

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

3.00%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{eq}}\) - PRIN_1

“ANALYTIQUE”

-60.

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

2.00%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{eq}}\) - PRIN_2

“ANALYTIQUE”

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

23.%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{eq}}\) - PRIN_3

“ANALYTIQUE”

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

5.5%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{eq}}\) - VMIS

“ANALYTIQUE”

138.56

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

1.00%

3.00%

Results at point \(F\):

  • first column AXIS_INCO_UPG without imposing \(\mathrm{GONF}=0\)

  • second column AXIS_INCO_UPG by imposing \(\mathrm{GONF}=0\)

  • third column AXIS_INCO_UP with quadratic mesh

  • fourth column AXIS_INCO_UP with linear mesh

  • fifth column AXIS_INCO_UPO with linear elements

Identification

Reference type

Reference value

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

\(u\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

  1. 10-5

0.10%

0.10%

0.10%

0.10%

2.0%

\(v\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{xx}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.10

0.70

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{yy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

1.1%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{zz}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

0.60%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{xy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

  1. 10-3

  1. 10-

  1. 10-3

0.01

0.2

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{xx}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

-1.5 10-4

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

0.50%

1.0%

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{yy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{xy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

10-5

Checking the transition to the nodes for the middle nodes (only for the result obtained without imposing \(\mathrm{GONF}=0\))

\(\mathrm{NOEUMIA}\)

Identification

Reference type

Reference value

Tolerance ( \(\text{\%}\) )

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{xx}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

-60.

0.50%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{yy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

0.50%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{zz}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

0.50%

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{xx}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

-6. 10—4

0.50%

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{yy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

  1. 10—4

0.50%

\(\mathrm{NOEUMIB}\)

Identification

Reference type

Reference value

Tolerance ( \(\text{\%}\) )

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{xx}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

0.50%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{yy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

0.50%

\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{zz}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

0.50%

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{xx}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

-1.5 10—4

0.50%

\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{yy}}\)

“ANALYTIQUE”

1.5 10—4

0.50%

6.4. notes#

The precision obtained is very good.