8. F modeling

8.1. Characteristics of F modeling

It is the same modeling and the same mesh as the E modeling but in AXI. The models AXI_THH2MS, AXI_HH2MS,, AXI_THH2S and AXI_HH2S are tested successively.

8.2. Tested values and results

As before, it is verified that the water flow (“FH11X” + “FH12X” recovered by SIEF_NOEU) obtained on the taxation edge corresponds to its analytical expression, namely \(q_{w}^{ext}{.}n= \alpha.\rho_{vp}.\left( exp\left[ \frac{Pc.M_{H2O}}{\rho_{l}.R.T}\right] -{HR}^{ext} \right)\). A tolerance of 10% is allowed due to the size of the mesh and the error generated by the interpolation at the node.

Points \((x,y)\)	Time ( \(s\) )	“FH11X” + “FH12X”	Analytical value
\((\mathrm{0,2};0)\)	1800	7.3754E-09	8.09e-09

For reasons of saving time, models other than AXI_THH2MS will only be tested for 60 s. We check that the pressures at 60 s are all the same regardless of the models.

Points \((x,y)\)	Time ( \(s\) )	PRE1
\((\mathrm{0,2};0)\)	1800	10019