5. C modeling#

5.1. Characteristics of C modeling#

Using QUAD4 elements

_images/1000045E000069D500006EE67EA6F9AA990F402E.svg

5.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

Number of knots: 4

Number of meshes and types: 3 MECPQU4

Modeling in plane constraints: C_ PLAN

Loading and boundary conditions are modelled by:

  • DDL_IMPO: (Node NO1 DX = 0, DY = 0)

(Node NO2 DY = 0)

(Knot NO4 DX = 0)

  • forces imposed on nodes \(\mathrm{NO2}\) and \(\mathrm{NO3}\).

5.3. Tested sizes and results#

Identification

Instant

Reference

Aster

% difference

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

1

1,500000E+00

1,500000E+00

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

1

6,938894E—18

1,351398E—14

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

1

9,000000E—01

9,000000E—01

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

1

—1.040834E—17

—2.142673E—14

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

1

6,000000E—01

6,000000E—01

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

1

—6,938894E—18

—2,924612E—14

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

2

3,000000E+00

3,000000E+00

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

2

4.861944E—13

9.617834E—14

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

2

1,800000E+00

1,800000E+00

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

2

—2.081668E—17

—8.301280E—14

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

2

1,200000E+00

1,200000E+00

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

2

—3,469447E—18

—9,360717E—14

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

3

3,147155E+00

3,145788E+00

—0,043

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

3

3,199571E—01

3,167040E—01

—1,017

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

3

3.511707E+00

3.512527E+00

0.023

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

3

—1,900098E—01

—1,900224E—01

,007

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

3

2.341138E+00

2.341685E+00

0.023

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

3

—1,279828E—01

—1,266816E—01

—1,017

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

4

3.252919E+00

3.250686E+00

—0.069

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

4

5,950074E—01

5,886268E—01

—1,072

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

4

5,814267E+00

5,816233E+00

0.034

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

4

—3.523377E—01

—3.520328E—01

—0.087

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

4

3.878832E+00

3.883081E+00

0.11

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

4

—2.380030E—01

—2.365919E—01

—0.593

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

5

3,213822E+00

3,214343E+00

0.016

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

5

4.873069E—01

4.886892E—01

0.284

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

5

6.017834E+00

6.015971E+00

—0.031

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

5

3,174572E—02

3,174572E—02

3,207066E—02

1,024

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

5

5,768340E+00

5,769686E+00

0.023

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

5

—5,231355E—01

—5,207598E—01

—0,454

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

6

3.209297E+00

3.210140E+00

0.026

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

6

4.753345E—01

4.775721E—01

0.471

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

6

6,149462E+00

6,146788E+00

—0.043

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

6

3.048490E—01

3.048490E—01

3.052262E—01

0.124

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

6

7,571241E+00

7,573072E+00

0.024

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

6

—7,863557E—01

—7,827982E—01

—0,452

5.4. notes#

Idem modeling A concerning the number of increments on the precision of the results.

The number of iterations is equal to 360.