3. Modeling A#

3.1. Characteristics of modeling A#

Using QUAD4 elements

_images/1000045E000069D500006EE67EA6F9AA990F402E.svg

Modeling in plane constraints: C_ PLAN

Loading and boundary conditions are modelled by:

  • DDL_IMPO: (Node NO1 DX = 0, DY = 0)

(Node NO2 DY = 0)

(Knot NO4 DX = 0)

  • forces imposed on nodes \(\mathrm{NO2}\) and \(\mathrm{NO3}\).

3.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

Number of knots: 4

Number of meshes and types: 3 MECPQU4

3.3. Tested sizes and results#

Identification

Instant

Reference

Aster

% difference

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

1

1,500000E+00

1,500000E+00

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

1

6,938894E—18

1,291047E—14

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

1

9,000000E—01

9,000000E—01

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

1

—1.040834E—17

—1.509903E—14

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

1

6,000000E—01

6,000000E—01

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

1

—6,938894E—18

—2,107830E—14

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

2

3,000000E+00

3,000000E+00

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

2

4.861944E—13

1.359551E—13

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

2

1,800000E+00

1,800000E+00

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

2

—2.081668E—17

—1.093097E—13

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

2

1,200000E+00

1,200000E+00

0

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

2

—3,469447E—18

—1,007126E—13

0

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

3

3,147155E+00

3,145788E+00

—0,043

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

3

3,199571E—01

3,167040E—01

—1,017

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

3

3.511707E+00

3.512527E+00

0.023

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

3

—1,900098E—01

—1,900224E—01

,007

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

3

2.341138E+00

2.341685E+00

0.023

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

3

—1,279828E—01

—1,266816E—01

—1,017

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

4

3.252919E+00

3.250728E+00

—0.067

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

4

5,950074E—01

5,887464E—01

—1,052

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

4

5,814267E+00

5,816159E+00

0.033

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

4

—3.523377E—01

—3.521695E—01

—0.048

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

4

3.878832E+00

3.882391E+00

0.092

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

4

—2.380030E—01

—2.364650E—01

—0.646

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

5

3,213822E+00

3,214367E+00

0.017

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

5

4.873069E—01

4.887527E—01

0.297

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

5

6.017834E+00

6.015985E+00

—0.031

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

5

3,174572E—02

3,174572E—02

3,209818E—02

1,11

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

5

5,768340E+00

5,769681E+00

0.023

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

5

—5,231355E—01

—5,207413E—01

—0,458

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 1)

6

3.209297E+00

3.210194E+00

0.028

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 1)

6

4.753345E—01

4.777143E—01

0.501

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 2)

6

6,149462E+00

6,146791E+00

—0.043

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 2)

6

3.048490E—01

3.048490E—01

3.052330E—01

0.126

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) (mesh 3)

6

7,571241E+00

7,572486E+00

0.016

\(\mathit{SIYY}\) (mesh 3)

6

—7.863557E—01

—7.826545E—01

—0.471

—0.471

3.4. notes#

To obtain correct precision, a large number of increments must be imposed for each loading step (60 increments).

The number of iterations is equal to 411.