16. G modeling results

16.1. Tested values

Identification	Reference	% difference
\(\mathrm{M1}(x=0.2)\)
t = 0.1 N12	65.48	—0.17
N17	65.49	—0.33
t = 0.2 N12	75.58	+0.34
N17	75.58	+0.29
t = 0.7 N12	93.01	—0.14
N17	93.01	—0.16
t = 2.0 N12	99.72	—0.02
N17	99.72	—0.02
\(\mathrm{M2}(x=0.8)\)
t = 0.1 N48	8.09	—0.11
N53	8.09	—1.43
t = 0.2 N48	26.37	—1.96
N53	26.37	—2.39
t = 0.7 N48	78.47	—0.51
N53	78.47	—0.55
t = 2.0 N48	99.13	—0.05
N53	99.13	—0.05

16.2. notes

At the beginning of the transition, slightly different values are observed between the nodes located in a plane \(x=\mathrm{constante}\) (\(<3\text{pour}1000\)). This anomaly seems to be due to modeling in tetrahedra with 4 knots. However, the results remain correct compared to the other 3D elements.