G modeling results
==============================

Tested values
---------------

.. csv-table::

    "**Identification**", "**Reference**", "**% difference**"
    ":math:`\mathrm{M1}(x=0.2)` ", "", ""
    "t = 0.1 N12", "65.48", "—0.17"
    "N17", "65.49", "—0.33"
    "t = 0.2 N12", "75.58", "+0.34"
    "N17", "75.58", "+0.29"
    "t = 0.7 N12", "93.01", "—0.14"
    "N17", "93.01", "—0.16"
    "t = 2.0 N12", "99.72", "—0.02"
    "N17", "99.72", "—0.02"
    "", "", ""
    ":math:`\mathrm{M2}(x=0.8)` ", "", ""
    "t = 0.1 N48", "8.09", "—0.11"
    "N53", "8.09", "—1.43"
    "t = 0.2 N48", "26.37", "—1.96"
    "N53", "26.37", "—2.39"
    "t = 0.7 N48", "78.47", "—0.51"
    "N53", "78.47", "—0.55"
    "t = 2.0 N48", "99.13", "—0.05"
    "N53", "99.13", "—0.05"



notes
---------

At the beginning of the transition, slightly different values are observed between the nodes located in a plane :math:`x=\mathrm{constante}` (:math:`<3\text{pour}1000`). This anomaly seems to be due to modeling in tetrahedra with 4 knots. However, the results remain correct compared to the other 3D elements.