3. Modeling A#

3.1. Characteristics of modeling#

This modeling allows the validation of integration by modal recombination.

Discreet element of translational rigidity

_images/10000DF000001FF0000006345695854C605BA72A.svg

Characteristics of the elements

DISCRETavec

nodal masses

M_T_D_N

M_T_N

M_T_N

stiffness matrices

K_T_D_L

K_T_L

damping matrices

A_T_D_L

A_T_L

Block degrees of freedom in \(Y\) and \(Z\) for all nodes

Boundary conditions at extreme knots

Node names:

Point \(A=\mathrm{N1}\)

\({P}_{1}=\mathrm{N2}\)

Point \(B=\mathrm{N10}\)

\({P}_{2}=\mathrm{N3}\)

\({P}_{8}=\mathrm{N9}\)

Modal recombination with all modes (i.e. 8),

EULER diagram, resumption of a first calculation at \(t=0.455s\)

time step used: \(\Delta t=1.E–3s\).

3.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

Number of knots: 10

Number of meshes and types: 9 SEG2

3.3. Tested sizes and results#

Time

Reference

0.09

4.02 E—5

0.18

4.22 E—6

0.27

3.89 E—5

0.37

5.98 E—6

0.46

3.73 E—5

0.54

7.14 E—6

0.63

3.64 E—5

0.72

8.07 E—6

0.81

3.58 E—5

0.9

8.76 E—6

0.99

3.52 E—5

1.08

—3.08 E—5

1.18

3.02 E—5

1.27

—2.88 E—5

1.36

2.80 E—5

1.45

—2.65 E—5

3.4. notes#

The relative minima (\(t=0.18,0.54,\dots\)) do not have very good precision during the excitation phase with a \(\Delta t=0.001\) step.