2. Benchmark solution#
2.1. Calculation method used for the reference solution#
The reference solution was obtained with a finite shell element DKT24 (4x6 mesh) at 4 nodes with 6 degrees of freedom per node in Total Lagrangian Formulation. This solution is described in detail in [bib2].
2.2. Benchmark results#
\({W}_{A}\) \(\times {10}^{-\mathrm{3m}}\) |
Charge \(P\) (\(\mathrm{KN}\)) |
Charge \(P/\mathrm{Pmax}\) |
\({W}_{A}\) \(\times {10}^{-\mathrm{3m}}\) |
Charge \(P\) (\(\mathrm{KN}\)) |
Charge \(P/\mathrm{Pmax}\) |
\({W}_{A}\) \(\times {10}^{-\mathrm{3m}}\) |
Charge \(P\) (\(\mathrm{KN}\)) |
Charge \(P/\mathrm{Pmax}\) |
|||||||||||
0.0 |
0.000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
—16.4 |
0.480 |
0.8000 |
—14.0 |
—0.295 |
—0.295 |
—0.295 |
—0.295 |
—0.4916 |
|||||||
—1.7 |
0.150 |
0.2500 |
0.2500 |
—16.7 |
0.415 |
0.6916 |
—14.3 |
—0.345 |
—0.345 |
—0.345 |
—0.345 |
—0.5750 |
|||||||
—3.5 |
0.265 |
0.4416 |
0.4416 |
—16.9 |
0.350 |
0.5833 |
—15.0 |
—0.370 |
—0.370 |
—0.370 |
—0.6166 |
||||||||
—4.9 |
0.345 |
0.5750 |
—17.0 |
—17.0 |
0.290 |
0.4833 |
—16.1 |
—16.1 |
—0.380 |
—0.380 |
—0.6333 |
||||||||
—6.8 |
0.410 |
0.6833 |
0.6833 |
—17.3 |
0.375 |
—0.375 |
—0.375 |
—0.375 |
—0.6250 |
||||||||||
—8.4 |
0.475 |
0.7916 |
—7916 |
—17.1 |
0.150 |
0.2500 |
—18.7 |
—0.350 |
—0.350 |
—0.350 |
—0.350 |
—0.350 |
—0.350 |
—0.350 |
—0.350 |
—0.5833 |
|||
—9.8 |
0.520 |
0.8666 |
—17.0 |
0.090 |
0.1500 |
—20.3 |
—0.3 |
—0.305 |
—0.305 |
—0.305 |
—0.5083 |
||||||||
—11.1 |
0.555 |
0.9250 |
9250 |
—16.8 |
—16.8 |
—0.230 |
—0.230 |
—0.230 |
—0.3833 |
||||||||||
—12.2 |
0.580 |
0.9666 |
—666 |
—16.4 |
—0.035 |
—0.0583 |
—23.5 |
—23.5 |
—0.120 |
—0.120 |
—0.2000 |
||||||||
—13.1 |
0.595 |
0.9916 |
0.9916 |
—16.0 |
—0.085 |
—0.1416 |
—25.2 |
0.025 |
0.025 |
0.0416 |
|||||||||
—14.0 |
0.600 |
1.0000 |
1.0000 |
—15.3 |
—0.130 |
—0.2166 |
—26.8 |
1.0000 |
0.210 |
0.210 |
0.3500 |
||||||||
—14.9 |
0.585 |
0.9750 |
0.9750 |
—14.8 |
—0.155 |
—0.2583 |
—28.5 |
0.9750 |
0.445 |
0.445 |
0.7416 |
||||||||
—15.5 |
0.565 |
0.9416 |
—14.2 |
—0.195 |
—0.3250 |
||||||||||||||
—16.1 |
0.525 |
0.8750 |
—8750 |
—14.0 |
—0.240 |
—0.4000 |
2.3. Uncertainty about the solution#
Less than 2%, digital solution
2.4. Bibliographical references#
HAMMADI Fodil: Formulation and evaluation of finite elements with C° continuity of geometry for the linear and non-linear analysis of shells.
JAAMEI S.,: Study of various Lagrangian formulations for the nonlinear analysis of thin elasto-plastic plates and shells in large displacements and rotations, Doctoral thesis, University of Technology of Compiègne 1986.