3. Modeling A#

The specimen is meshed with two TRIA3 elements at three nodes for all models.

  • 2 grid elements to model the fibers in the \(\mathrm{OX}\) direction

  • 2 grid elements to model the fibers in the \(\mathrm{OY}\) direction

The nodes of the elements are common for each of the reinforcing plies.

_images/100004C6000069D500004D1AFEA1C75A82055C99.svg

3.1. Modeling A results (linear isotropic work hardening)#

3.1.1. Thermal loading for modeling A#

Reference temperature: 50

Loading history: \({\mathrm{Evolution}}_{A}\) (see [§1.4])

The temperatures came in like a knotty field.

3.1.2. Results#

Values of \(\mathit{SIXX}\) at the node \(\mathrm{NO1}\) (in the direction of the longitudinal reinforcements) and \(\mathit{SIXX}\) at the node \(\mathrm{NO1}\) (in the direction of the transverse reinforcements) and those of the Maximum and Minimum of the internal variables \(\mathrm{V1}\) and \(\mathrm{V3}\) are recorded.

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) in meshes modeling fibers oriented according to \(\mathrm{OX}\)

\(\mathit{SIXX}\) in meshes modeling fibers oriented according to \(\mathrm{OY}\)

Instant

Reference

Aster_code

Ecart

Reference

Aster_code

Ecart

1

2,0000E+08

2,0000E+08

0

2,0000E+08

2,0000E+08

0

2

2,4000E+08

2,4000E+08

0

2,4000E+08

2,4000E+08

0

3

4,0000E+07

4,0000E+07

0

4,0000E+07

4,0000E+07

0

4

2,4000E+08

2,4000E+08

0

2,4000E+08

2,4000E+08

0

5

—1,6000E+08

—1,6000E+08

0

—1,6000E+08

—1,6000E+08

0

6

— 3,1200E+08

— 3,1200E+08

0

— 3,1200E+08

— 3,1200E+08

0

7

2,8800E+08

2,8800E+08

0

2,8800E+08

2,8800E+08

0

8

4.0960E+08

4.0960E+08

0

4.0960E+08

4.0960E+08

0

9

—2.7040E+08

—2.7040E+08

0

—2.7040E+08

—2.7040E+08

0

10

— 5,2768E+08

— 5,2768E+08

0

— 5,2768E+08

— 5,2768E+08

0

11

4.7232E+08

4.7232E+08

0

4.7232E+08

4.7232E+08

0

Instant

Internal variables

min

Maximum

Aster_code

Reference

Aster_code

Reference

1

V1

0

0

0

0

V3

0

0

0

0

2

V1

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

V3

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

3

V1

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

V3

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

4

V1

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

V3

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

5

V1

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

V3

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

1.8E-03

6

V1

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

V3

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

7

V1

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

V3

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

5.04E-03

8

V1

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

V3

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

9

V1

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

V3

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

9.432E-03

10

V1

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

V3

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

11

V1

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

V3

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

1.47456E-02

Notes:

The results shown are given in the reference frame \(({X}_{\mathrm{ref}},{Y}_{\mathrm{ref}})\) making an angle of \(0°\) with respect to \((X,Y)\) .

The test case studied corresponds to the following diagram in a stress-deformation plane:

_images/Object_17.svg