3. Modeling A#
3.1. Characteristics of modeling#
3D modeling is used.
3.2. Characteristics of the mesh#
The mesh contains 1128 elements of type HEXA8.
The first calculation is done with the contact in formulation CONTINUE and without macro-elements;
The second calculation is done with the contact in formulation CONTINUE and the cube is represented by a macroelement;
The third calculation is done with the contact in formulation DISCRETE and the cube is represented by a macroelement;
3.3. Tested sizes and results#
The vertical displacement and reaction are tested at point \(A\).
First calculation (without macro-element) — Contact in formulation CONTINUE — Reference
Identification |
Reference type |
Reference value |
Tolerance |
Point \(A\) - \(\mathit{DZ}\) |
“ANALYTIQUE” |
0 |
1.00E-012 |
Point \(A\) - \(\mathit{RZ}\) |
“NON_REGRESSION” |
-1.380156E+009 |
1.00E-006 |
Second calculation (with macro-element) — Contact in formulation CONTINUE
Identification |
Reference type |
Reference value |
Tolerance |
Point \(A\) - \(\mathit{DZ}\) |
“ANALYTIQUE” |
0 |
1.00E-012 |
Point \(A\) - \(\mathit{RZ}\) |
“AUTRE_ASTER” |
-1.380156E+009 |
1.00E-006 |
Third calculation (with macro-element) — Contact in formulation DISCRETE
Identification |
Reference type |
Reference value |
Tolerance |
Point \(A\) - \(\mathit{DZ}\) |
“ANALYTIQUE” |
0 |
1.00E-012 |
Point \(A\) - \(\mathit{RZ}\) |
“AUTRE_ASTER” |
-1.380156E+009 |
1.00E-006 |
3.4. notes#
All three calculations give exactly the same results.