2. Modeling A#

2.1. Characteristics of modeling#

Modeling A is*bidimensional* and*static nonlinear*. The calculation is carried out using pure mechanics, without hydromechanical coupling (equivalent to a perfectly drained soil).

We can first verify the coherence of the initial state (in particular the boundary conditions with the pre-consolidation state of the soil): mechanical balance must be established when only gravity acts, so the state of the system must not change.

The elastoplastic behavior law used is that of Cam-Clay, cf. [R7.01.14].

The vertical displacement is imposed on the GROUP_MA = “APPUI” representing the interface between the foundation and the ground, and varies between \(0.\) and \(–0.05m\) in 20 time steps between \(t\mathrm{=}0.s\) and \(t=1.0\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}{10}^{+7}s\)

_images/10000000000004FE000003AF3570FEDCCBE5B913.png

Figure 2: mesh of the shooting foundation for modeling A.

2.2. Tested sizes and results#

The solutions are calculated at points \(O\) and \(F\) and compared to FLAC references. They are first given in terms of equivalent stress \(Q\) as a function of the effective consolidation pressure \(P’\), and summarized in the following tables:

\(P\text{'}=\frac{1}{3}\mathrm{.}\mathit{trace}(\mathrm{\sigma }\text{'})\); \(Q=\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{:}\mathrm{s}}\) (where \(\mathrm{s}=\mathrm{\sigma }\text{'}-P\text{'}\mathrm{.}\mathrm{Id}\))

At point \(O\), under the foundation in the center:

\(P’\) [\(\mathit{Pa}\)]

\(Q\) Code_Aster [\(\mathit{Pa}\)]

\(Q\) FLAC [\(\mathit{Pa}\)]

relative error

102000

434

450

-0.035%

110000

19662

20000

-1.689%

120000

25837

26060

-0.855%

130000

29290

29490

-0.679%

146000

34006

34040

-0.100%

At point \(F\):

\(P’\) [\(\mathit{Pa}\)]

\(Q\) Code_Aster [\(\mathit{Pa}\)]

\(Q\) FLAC [\(\mathit{Pa}\)]

relative error

101900

227

76

+199%

100000

4945

4950

-0.110%

98000

9941

10420

-4.593%

96000

15283

16830

-9.190%

94000

20036

21870

-8.385%

The resultant of the forces exerted on the foundation as a function of its sinking is then calculated. This is also compared to the solution given by FLAC:

\(\mathit{UY}\) [\(m\)]

Code_Aster [\(N/m\)]

FLAC [\(N/m\)]

relative error

-0.005

-110105

-108500

+1.479%

-0.02

-129224

-125800

+2.722%

-0.04

-149470

-144600

+3.368%

-0.06

-167066

-160900

+3.832%

-0.0875

-188825

-181100

+4.266%