1. Reference problem#
1.1. Geometry#

C
D
B
A

Length |
\(L=50\mathrm{mm}\) |
Width |
\(W=16\mathrm{mm}\) |
Crack depth |
\(a=6\mathrm{mm}\) |
1.2. Material properties#
The material is elastoplastic of the Von Mises type. For models A to D, there is no work hardening. For the E-modeling, various work-hardening laws are compared (linear or power hardening). The properties of the material are as follows:
Young’s module |
\(E=\mathrm{2,0601}{10}^{5}\mathrm{MPa}\) |
Poisson’s Ratio |
\(\nu =0.3\) |
Elastic limit |
\({\sigma }_{y}=\mathrm{808,34}\mathrm{MPa}\) |
Work hardening module |
\(H=0\) (modeling A to D) or \(H=\mathrm{6,867}{10}^{4}\mathrm{MPa}\) (modeling E) |
1.3. Boundary conditions and loading#
For models A, B, and E, the model is limited to half of the structure, the plane of the vertical crack being a plane of symmetry. For the C and D models, the entire structure is represented.
Boundary conditions
Vertical displacement \(\mathrm{UX}=0\) at point \(B\)
Horizontal displacement \(\mathrm{UY}=0\) in ligament \(\mathrm{AB}\) (symmetry condition for models A, B and E)
Loading
Horizontal displacement imposed on segment \(\mathrm{CD}\): \(\mathrm{UY}=\delta\)