1. Reference problem#

1.1. Geometry#

_images/Shape1.gif

C

D

B

A

_images/Object_1.png

Length

\(L=50\mathrm{mm}\)

Width

\(W=16\mathrm{mm}\)

Crack depth

\(a=6\mathrm{mm}\)

1.2. Material properties#

The material is elastoplastic of the Von Mises type. For models A to D, there is no work hardening. For the E-modeling, various work-hardening laws are compared (linear or power hardening). The properties of the material are as follows:

Young’s module

\(E=\mathrm{2,0601}{10}^{5}\mathrm{MPa}\)

Poisson’s Ratio

\(\nu =0.3\)

Elastic limit

\({\sigma }_{y}=\mathrm{808,34}\mathrm{MPa}\)

Work hardening module

\(H=0\) (modeling A to D) or \(H=\mathrm{6,867}{10}^{4}\mathrm{MPa}\) (modeling E)

1.3. Boundary conditions and loading#

For models A, B, and E, the model is limited to half of the structure, the plane of the vertical crack being a plane of symmetry. For the C and D models, the entire structure is represented.

Boundary conditions

Vertical displacement \(\mathrm{UX}=0\) at point \(B\)

Horizontal displacement \(\mathrm{UY}=0\) in ligament \(\mathrm{AB}\) (symmetry condition for models A, B and E)

Loading

Horizontal displacement imposed on segment \(\mathrm{CD}\): \(\mathrm{UY}=\delta\)