12. Modeling results E

12.1. Tested values

Node	Size	Reference
\(B\)	\(u\)	2.0833 10—3
	\(v\)
	\(w\)	—2.0833 10—3
	\({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\)	—1.
\(E\)	\(u\)	0.25
	\(v\)
	\(w\)	0.25
	\({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\)
\(F\)	\(u\)	0.250521
	\(v\)	—0.04166
	\(w\)	0.249479
	\({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\)	—0.5
\(G\)	\(u\)	0.252083
	\(v\)	—0.083333
	\(w\)	0.247917
	\({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\)	—1.

12.2. notes

The precision on the movements is less than 3%, that on the constraints is less than 2%.

In this example, TRIA3 converge much less quickly than QUAD4 to the exact solution.