23. U modeling#
23.1. Characteristics of modeling#
Q4GG quadrangular and triangular shell element.
Boundary conditions:
DDL_IMPO |
(GROUP_NO: AB, DX: 0. , DZ: 0. , DRY :0.) |
(GROUP_NO: BC, DY: 0. , DZ: 0. , DRX :0.) |
(GROUP_NO: CD, DX: 0. , DZ: 0. , DRY :0.) |
(GROUP_NO: DA, DY: 0. , DZ: 0. , DRX :0.) |
(GROUP_NO: O, DX: 0. , BY: 0. , DRX :0. , DRY :0. , DRZ :0.) |
FORCE_ARETE |
(GROUP_NO: AB MY:0.) |
(GROUP_NO: BC MX:0.) |
(GROUP_NO: CDMY:0.) |
(GROUP_NO: BY MAX:0.) |
23.2. Characteristics of the mesh#
Number of knots: 171
Number of meshes and type: 72 QUAD4, 144 TRIA3
23.3. Tested sizes and results#
Identification |
||
Point \(O\) |
\((\mathit{M258})\) |
\({N}_{\mathit{xx}}\), \({N}_{\mathit{yy}}\), \({N}_{\mathit{xy}}\), \({M}_{\mathit{xx}}\), \({M}_{\mathit{yy}}\),, \({M}_{\mathit{xy}}\), \({T}_{x}\), \({T}_{y}\) |
\((\mathit{M54})\) |
\({T}_{x}\), \({T}_{y}\) |
|
\((\mathit{M126})\) |
\({T}_{x}\), \({T}_{y}\) |
|
\(\mathit{DZ}\) |
||
Identification |
||
Point \(C\) |
\((\mathit{M108})\) |
\({N}_{\mathit{xx}}\), \({N}_{\mathit{yy}}\), \({N}_{\mathit{xy}}\), \({M}_{\mathit{xx}}\), \({M}_{\mathit{yy}}\),, \({M}_{\mathit{xy}}\), \({T}_{x}\), \({T}_{y}\) |
Identification |
||
\((\mathit{M126})\) |
Point 1 |
\({M}_{\mathit{xx}}\) |
\((\mathit{M259})\) |
Point 3 |
\({M}_{\mathit{yy}}\) |
23.4. notes#
In this modeling, we verify that it is possible to calculate the generalized constraints.
(\(N\), \(M\), \(T\)) from a travel field coming from Europlexus.