4. B modeling#

4.1. Characteristics of modeling#

Plate elements DKT are used

_images/100040CE000069D500002C8CDB573572E212921F.svg

The division is done in the following way:

We have

1

element between \({P}_{1}\) and \({P}_{2}\)

6

elements between \({P}_{2}\) and \({P}_{3}\)

1

element between \({P}_{3}\) and \({P}_{4}\)

1

element between \({P}_{17}\) and \({P}_{20}\)

10

elements along the sides parallel to \(y\) (\({P}_{4}{P}_{5}\) for example)

We pass 2 calculations:

  • in the first calculation, we establish solid body connections between the lines:

  • \({P}_{2}{P}_{7}\) and \({P}_{17}{P}_{22}\)

  • \({P}_{3}{P}_{6}\) and \({P}_{18}{P}_{21}\)

  • \({P}_{10}{P}_{15}\) and \({P}_{20}{P}_{23}\)

  • \({P}_{11}{P}_{14}\) and \({P}_{19}{P}_{24}\)

via the keyword factor “LIAISON_COQUE” from the AFFE_CHAR_MECA command.

  • in the second calculation, solid body connections are established between the nodes facing each other of the pairs of lines mentioned above via the keyword factor “LIAISON_SOLIDE” of the AFFE_CHAR_MECA command.

4.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

Number of nodes:

242

Count of elements TRIA3:

360

4.3. Tested sizes and results#

The results of the 2 calculations (one with LIAISON_COQUE, the other with LIAISON_SOLIDE) are identical. We will only mention the calculation with LIAISON_COQUE.

Clean mode order

Experimental reference

Experimental reference

% difference/finite element model

% difference/finite element model

7

  1. ± 1%

610.2

4.5

8

  1. ± 1.5%

852.4

3.2

9

  1. ± 1.7%

864.8

1.1

10

  1. ± 2%

923.9

1.4

11

  1. ± 3.6%

1110.8

—0.2

12

  1. ± 4%

1179.5

3.8

*average of 5 calculation codes

4.4. notes#

Calculations made by:

CALC_MODES

OPTION = “BANDE”, CALC_FREQ =_F (FREQ = (1.,1200.)), SOLVEUR_MODAL =_F (METHODE = “TRI_DIAG”, DIM_SOUS_ESPACE = 12)

4.5. Contents of the results file#

The first 6 non-zero natural frequencies (eigenvectors and modal parameters).