4. B modeling#
4.1. Characteristics of modeling#
Plate elements DKT are used
The division is done in the following way:
We have |
1 |
element between \({P}_{1}\) and \({P}_{2}\) |
6 |
elements between \({P}_{2}\) and \({P}_{3}\) |
|
1 |
element between \({P}_{3}\) and \({P}_{4}\) |
|
1 |
element between \({P}_{17}\) and \({P}_{20}\) |
|
10 |
elements along the sides parallel to \(y\) (\({P}_{4}{P}_{5}\) for example) |
We pass 2 calculations:
in the first calculation, we establish solid body connections between the lines:
\({P}_{2}{P}_{7}\) and \({P}_{17}{P}_{22}\)
\({P}_{3}{P}_{6}\) and \({P}_{18}{P}_{21}\)
\({P}_{10}{P}_{15}\) and \({P}_{20}{P}_{23}\)
\({P}_{11}{P}_{14}\) and \({P}_{19}{P}_{24}\)
via the keyword factor “LIAISON_COQUE” from the AFFE_CHAR_MECA command.
in the second calculation, solid body connections are established between the nodes facing each other of the pairs of lines mentioned above via the keyword factor “LIAISON_SOLIDE” of the AFFE_CHAR_MECA command.
4.2. Characteristics of the mesh#
Number of nodes: |
242 |
Count of elements TRIA3: |
360 |
4.3. Tested sizes and results#
The results of the 2 calculations (one with LIAISON_COQUE, the other with LIAISON_SOLIDE) are identical. We will only mention the calculation with LIAISON_COQUE.
Clean mode order |
Experimental reference |
Experimental reference |
% difference/finite element model |
% difference/finite element model |
7 |
|
610.2 |
4.5 |
|
8 |
|
852.4 |
3.2 |
|
9 |
|
864.8 |
1.1 |
|
10 |
|
923.9 |
1.4 |
|
11 |
|
1110.8 |
—0.2 |
|
12 |
|
1179.5 |
3.8 |
*average of 5 calculation codes
4.4. notes#
Calculations made by:
CALC_MODES
OPTION = “BANDE”, CALC_FREQ =_F (FREQ = (1.,1200.)), SOLVEUR_MODAL =_F (METHODE = “TRI_DIAG”, DIM_SOUS_ESPACE = 12)
4.5. Contents of the results file#
The first 6 non-zero natural frequencies (eigenvectors and modal parameters).