4. B modeling#

4.1. Characteristics of B modeling#

Modeling B is a copy of modeling A in which material ELASpar was replaced by material ELAS_ORTH in order to validate the consideration of damping parameters in the case of orthotropic materials.

4.2. Tested sizes and results#

Identification

Reference

Reference type

Tolerance

Physical calculation: DX at node \(\mathit{N433}\)

\(9.05292783145e-07m\)

“AUTRE_ASTER”

1E -4%

Projected matrix calculation:DX at node \(\mathit{N433}\)

\(8.96432120282e-07m\)

“AUTRE_ASTER”

1E -4%

SIXX at the Gauss point number 1 of mesh \(\mathit{M1145}\)

\(4590176.44097\mathit{Pa}\)

“AUTRE_ASTER”

1E -4%

SIXX to the \(\mathit{N627}\) knot of knit \(\mathit{M1145}\)

\(4715493.552\mathit{Pa}\)

“AUTRE_ASTER”

1E -4%

EPXX at the Gauss point number 1 of mesh \(\mathit{M1145}\)

\(2.31913955511e-05\)

“AUTRE_ASTER”

1E -4%

EPXX to the \(\mathit{N627}\) knot of knit \(\mathit{M1145}\)

\(2.14446331642e-05\)

“AUTRE_ASTER”

1E -4%

Note: the tests are done by inter-comparison between harmonic calculation and transient calculation on a physical basis.

We calculate the kinetic energy ECIN_ELEM of the \(\mathit{M1145}\) cell:

Option

Component

Reference

Reference Type

Tolerance

ECIN_ELEM

TOTALE

7.02862 10—7

“AUTRE_ASTER”

1E -4%