4. B modeling#

4.1. Characteristics of modeling and meshes#

Digital mesh:

The digital mesh is done directly in ASTER format. It has 4 knots and 3 discreet stitches.

_images/10000000000001A10000006D6E7C040BE011C30F.png

Experimental mesh:

The measurement mesh includes only 2 point elements and 2 nodes:

_images/100000000000019600000069235D71002B0543DA.png

4.2. Characteristics of the measurements#

The experimental measurements provided are:

  • At node \(\mathrm{N3}\):

The data are axial displacements, multiplied by \(–1/\sqrt{2}\), and applied in the \(-x\) direction. The local orientation specified in the command file is \((45.0.0.)\)

The time sampling is constant: the initial time is \(0s\), the time step is \({10}^{-3}s\), and the number of moments is 1001 (i.e. up to a final time of \(1s\)).

  • At node \(\mathrm{N2}\):

The data is the axial displacements, applied in the \(X\) direction.

The time sampling is variable: all the moments are indicated from \(0s\) to \(1s\), in steps of \({10}^{-3}s\) (1001 moments in total).

The values are derived from the analytical calculation carried out with Maple.

4.3. Characteristics of the modal base#

The only two modes are stored in a mode_meca concept, created by the DEFI_BASE_MODALE command. The interface, of the Craig-Bampton type, is placed on the following degree of freedom in movement \(x\) of the node \(\mathrm{N2}\) (corresponding to the mass \(\mathrm{m1}\)). The modal base therefore contains a dynamic mode (with \(\mathrm{N2}\) locked) and a static mode.

4.4. Tested values#

Identification

Reference

Aster_code

difference

at*t* = 0.1 s

1.745 10—4

1.745 10—4

0.01%

at*t* = 0.3 s

6.797 10—4

6.797 10—4

0.01%

DEPL_X

At node \(\mathrm{N2}\)

at*t* = 0.5 s

—1.217 10—3

—1.217 10—3

0.01%

(\(m\))

(mass 1)

at*t* = 0.7 s

5.214 10—4

5.214 10—4

— 0.01%

at*t* = 0.9 s

9.031 10—4

9.031 10—4

0.00%

at*t* = 0.1 s

9.154 10—6

9.154 10—6

0.00%

at*t* = 0.3 s

6.414 10—4

6.414 10—4

0.00%

DEPL_X

At node \(\mathrm{N3}\)

at*t* = 0.5 s

—8.636 10—4

—8.636 10—4

0.00%

(\(m\))

(mass 2)

at*t* = 0.7 s

—1.107 10—4

—1.107 10—4

0.03%

at*t* = 0.9 s

1.633 10—3

1.633 10—3

0.02%

at*t* = 0.1 s

4.586 10—3

4.616 10—3

0.65%

at*t* = 0.3 s

—7.598 10—3

—7.663 10—3

0.85%

VITE_X

At node \(\mathrm{N2}\)

at*t* = 0.5 s

—1.581 10—4

—8,000 10—5

7.81 10—5m/s

(\(m/s\))

(mass 1)

at*t* = 0.7 s

9.382 10—3

9.354 10—3

— 0.30%

at*t* = 0.9 s

—7.481 10—3

—7.537 10—3

0.75%

at*t* = 0.1 s

4.328 10—4

4.405 10—4

1.79%

at*t* = 0.3 s

3.671 10—3

3.640 10—3

— 0.84%

VITE_X

At node \(\mathrm{N3}\)

at*t* = 0.5 s

—1.539 10—2

—1.536 10—2

— 0.20%

(\(m/s\))

(mass 2)

at*t* = 0.7 s

2.453 10—2

2.457 10—2

0.15%

at*t* = 0.9 s

—1.899 10—2

—1.912 10—2

0.68%

at*t* = 0.1 s

6.112 10—2

6.100 10—2

— 0.20%

at*t* = 0.3 s

—1.306 10—1

—1.300 10—1

— 0.46%

ACCE_X

At node \(\mathrm{N2}\)

at*t* = 0.5 s

1.571 10—1

1.600 10—1

1.85%

(\(m/{s}^{2}\))

(mass 1)

at*t* = 0.7 s

—5.657 10—2

—5.800 10—2

2.53%

at*t* = 0.9 s

—1.124 10—1

—1.130 10—1

0.53%

at*t* = 0.1 s

1.562 10—2

1.618 10—2

3.58%

at*t* = 0.3 s

—6.031 10—2

—6.223 10—2

3.18%

ACCE_X

At node \(\mathrm{N3}\)

at*t* = 0.5 s

5.102 10—2

5.374 10—2

5.33%

(\(m/{s}^{2}\))

(mass 2)

at*t* = 0.7 s

7.428 10—2

7.043 10—2

— 5.19%

at*t* = 0.9 s

—2.364 10—1

—2.263 10—1

— 4.28%

Note:

The speed at the node \(\mathrm{N2}\) at instant \(t=0.5s\) being relatively close to zero, the comparison is carried out for this case in absolute value.