4. B modeling#

4.1. Characteristics of modeling#

3D modeling is used. The crack is not shown. The entries for the POST_FM operator are read from tables extracted from a prior calculation.

4.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

The mesh contains 6 elements of type PENTA15. These elements correspond to the support of the crack bottom node \(B\) from modeling A.

_images/10000000000001AB000001EC163948EE1313062B.png

4.3. Tested sizes and results#

We test the output table for operator POST_FM. This table is obtained in point \(B\). The results obtained are the same as those obtained by the a priory calculation.

Identification

Reference type

Reference value

Precision

\(\mathit{MIN}\) - \(\mathit{TEMP}\)

“NON_REGRESSION”

39.0786

1e-06

\(\mathit{MIN}\) - \(\mathit{KIC}\)

“NON_REGRESSION”

1e-06

\(\mathit{MAX}\) - \(\mathit{KELAS}\)

“AUTRE_ASTER”

0.2%

\(\mathit{MAX}\) - \(\mathit{KPLAS}\)

“AUTRE_ASTER”

0.2%

\(\mathit{MAX}\) - \(\mathit{KCP}\)

“NON_REGRESSION”

1e-06

\(\mathit{MIN}\) - \(\mathit{FM}\text{\_}\mathit{ASN}\)

“AUTRE_ASTER”

1.21557

0.5%

\(\mathit{INST}=3300\) - \(\mathit{FM}\text{\_}\mathit{ASN}\)

“NON_REGRESSION”

1.2208980

1e-06

4.4. notes#

We validate the case of a defect of type DSR, defined by the condition \(\mathit{max}(\mathit{KPLAS})>\mathit{max}(\mathit{KELAS})\).