2. Benchmark solution#
2.1. Calculation method used for the reference solution#
This test is taken from the software validation manual POSTDAM version 1.0. The reference solutions are given in this document.
2.2. Benchmark results#
First call to POST_FATIGUE: method RAINFLOW from \({\sigma }_{1}(t)\)
Nb_Cycl = 4 |
Cycle 1 |
Vale_Min: |
Vale_Max: |
||
Cycle 2 |
Vale_Min: |
Vale_Max: |
|||
Cycle 3 |
Vale_Min: |
—300. |
Vale_Max: |
||
Cycle 4 |
Vale_Min: |
—500. |
Vale_Max: |
Second call to POST_FATIGUE: method RCCM from \({\sigma }_{1}(t)\)
Nb_Cycl = 5 |
Cycle 1 |
Vale_Min: |
—500. |
Vale_Max: |
|
Cycle 2 |
Vale_Min: |
—300. |
Vale_Max: |
||
Cycle 3 |
Vale_Min: |
Vale_Max: |
|||
Cycle 4 |
Vale_Min: |
Vale_Max: |
|||
Cycle 5 |
Vale_Min: |
88.8889 |
Vale_Max: |
Third call to POST_FATIGUE: method RAINFLOW from \({\sigma }_{2}(t)\) with \({K}_{T}=2\).
(Results identical to the first call to POST_FATIGUE since we take a loading \({\sigma }_{2}(t)=1/2{\sigma }_{1}(t)\), then we multiply the loading history by a stress concentration coefficient \({K}_{T}=2.\)).
Nb_Cycl = 4 |
Cycle 1 |
Vale_Min: |
Vale_Max: |
||
Cycle 2 |
Vale_Min: |
Vale_Max: |
|||
Cycle 3 |
Vale_Min: |
—300. |
Vale_Max: |
||
Cycle 4 |
Vale_Min: |
—500. |
Vale_Max: |
Fourth call to POST_FATIGUE: method RCCM from \({\sigma }_{2}(t)\) with \({K}_{T}=2\).
(Results identical to the second call to POST_FATIGUE since we take a loading \({\sigma }_{2}(t)=1/2{\sigma }_{1}(t)\), then we multiply the loading history by a stress concentration coefficient \({K}_{T}=2.\)).
Nb_Cycl = 5 |
Cycle 1 |
Vale_Min: |
—500. |
Vale_Max: |
|
Cycle 2 |
Vale_Min: |
—300. |
Vale_Max: |
||
Cycle 3 |
Vale_Min: |
Vale_Max: |
|||
Cycle 4 |
Vale_Min: |
Vale_Max: |
|||
Cycle 5 |
Vale_Min: |
88.8889 |
Vale_Max: |
2.3. Uncertainty about the solution#
Analytical solution.
2.4. Bibliographical references#
POSTDAM version 1.0 validation manual. Fournier I., Vatin E. HP‑14/93/016B