4. B modeling#

4.1. Characteristics of modeling#

This is a 3D_HM modeling using quadratic HM- XFEM elements.

4.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

The block on which the modeling is performed is divided into 49 QUAD8.

4.3. Tested sizes and results#

We test the value of the vertical movements for the nodes \(A\), \(A\text{'}\),,, \(B\) and \(B\text{'}\) which are located on the interface as well as the value of the pressure of the fluid in the interface at these 4 points. These values are summarized in the table below:

Quantities tested

Reference type

Reference value

DY (node A below)

“NON_REGRESSION”

-1.291354325E-4 m

DY (node A above)

“NON_REGRESSION”

1.29078868E-4 m

DY (node A” below)

“NON_REGRESSION”

-1.290767537E-4 m

-1.290767537E-4 m

DY (node A” above)

“NON_REGRESSION”

1.291366642E-4 m

DY (node B below)

“NON_REGRESSION”

-1.08739681E-4 m

DY (node B above)

“NON_REGRESSION”

1.08687768E-4 m

DY (node B” below)

“NON_REGRESSION”

-1.08735144E-4 m

DY (node B” above)

“NON_REGRESSION”

1, E-4 m

PRE_FL1 (node A)

“NON_REGRESSION”

822498Pa

PRE_FL1 (node A”)

“NON_REGRESSION”

822565Pa

PRE_FL1 (node B)

“NON_REGRESSION”

762613Pa

PRE_FL1 (node B”)

“NON_REGRESSION”

762664Pa

4.4. notes#

The pore pressure field and the amplified deformation (X1000) (Figure) were also post-treated using SALOME.

Figure 4.4-a : Field of pre**s** amplified pore and deformed (X1000)

_images/10000000000004B2000002F3E8DF4247DC30AFDA.png