4. B modeling#
4.1. Characteristics of modeling#
The mesh and the data are identical to modeling A; the only difference comes from behavior META_P_IL_PT (taking into account transformation plasticity)
4.2. Tested sizes and results#
Identification |
Reference |
Test |
Tolerance |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{p}\) \(t=47s\) |
0 |
|
0.1% |
\(\chi\) \(t=47s\) |
0 |
|
0.1% |
\({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\) \(t=47s\) |
282.106 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}\) \(t=47s\) |
-4.125 10—3 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{th}}\) \(t=47s\) |
-0.0055225 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{meca}}\) \(t=47s\) |
0.00141 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{plas}}\) \(t=47s\) |
0 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{p}\) \(t=48s\) |
3.2653 10—3 |
|
|
\(\chi\) \(t=48s\) |
1 |
|
0.1% |
\({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\) \(t=48s\) |
288.106 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}\) \(t=48s\) |
-9.3469 10—4 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{th}}\) \(t\mathrm{=}48s\) |
-0.00564 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{meca}}\) \(t\mathrm{=}48s\) |
0.004705 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{plas}}\) \(t\mathrm{=}48s\) |
0.0032653 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{p}\) \(t=60s\) |
0.04 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{p}\) \(t=64s\) |
0.04 |
|
0.1% |
\(\chi\) \(t=64s\) |
0 |
|
0.1% |
\({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\) \(t=64s\) |
360.106 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}\) \(t=64s\) |
4.00085 10—2 |
|
0.2% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{th}}\) \(t\mathrm{=}64s\) |
-0.007117 |
|
0.2% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{meca}}\) \(t\mathrm{=}64s\) |
0.047125 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{plas}}\) \(t\mathrm{=}64s\) |
0.04533 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{p}\) \(t=114s\) |
0.041071 |
|
0.1% |
\(\chi\) \(t=114s\) |
1 |
|
0.1% |
\({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\) \(t=114s\) |
360.106 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}\) \(t=114s\) |
0.072841 |
|
2.0% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{th}}\) \(t\mathrm{=}114s\) |
-0.00603 |
|
0.1% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{meca}}\) \(t\mathrm{=}114s\) |
0.07887 |
|
2.0% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{\mathit{plas}}\) \(t=114s\) |
0.07707 |
|
2.0% |
\({\epsilon }_{\mathit{zz}}^{p}\) \(t=176s\) |
0.062069 |
|
0.1% |
4.3. notes#
In this modeling, the term due to transformation plasticity is taken into account:
\({\dot{\epsilon }}^{\mathit{pt}}(T,Z)\ne 0\) when \(\dot{Z}\mathrm{\ne }0\)