7. E modeling

7.1. Characteristics of modeling

The behavior is MONOCRISTAL, in large deformations (DEFORMATION =” SIMO_MIEHE “), in a manner similar to modeling A, with a crystalline behavior that takes into account irradiation

7.2. Tested sizes and results

7.2.1. Tested values

Small deformations, comparison to modeling C.

Variable	Moments \((s)\)	Reference	Tolerance
\({E}_{\mathrm{zz}}\) EPSG_ELGA	0.02	0.02023	0.001
\({\sigma }_{\mathrm{zz}}\) (\(\mathrm{Mpa}\)) SIEF_ELGA	0.02	114.125	0.01
\({\rho }_{1}\) VARI_ELGA/V7)	0.02	9.8085E-07	0.005
\({\gamma }_{1}\) VARI_ELGA/V8)	0.02	0.0385	0.005
\({\rho }_{9}\) VARI_ELGA/V31)	0.02	1.0741E-07	0.13
\({\gamma }_{9}\) VARI_ELGA/V32)	0.02	1.04944E-03	0.33
Non-regression test on the last two values

\({\rho }_{9}\) VARI_ELGA/V31)	0.02	9.30093E-08	0.001
\({\gamma }_{9}\) VARI_ELGA/V32)	0.02	7.0377E-04	0.001

Large deformations, comparison to B modeling

Variable	Moments \((s)\)	Reference	Tolerance
\({E}_{\mathit{zz}}\) EPSG_ELGA	0.2	0.22385	0.002
\({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\) (\(\mathit{Mpa}\)) SIEF_ELGA	0.2	320.153	0.09
\({\rho }_{1}\) VARI_ELGA/V7)	0.2	1.731E-05	0.18
\({\gamma }_{1}\) VARI_ELGA/V8)	0.2	0.31346	0.06
\({\rho }_{9}\) VARI_ELGA/V31)	0.2	8.37E-07	0.06
\({\gamma }_{9}\) VARI_ELGA/V32)	0.2	0.010410	0.06
\({\rho }_{12}\) VARI_ELGA/V40)	0.2	1.719E-05	0.24
\({\gamma }_{12}\) VARI_ELGA/V41)	0.2	0.11118	0.21
Non-regression test
\({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\) (\(\mathit{Mpa}\)) SIEF_ELGA	0.2	293.247	0.001
\({\rho }_{1}\) VARI_ELGA/V7)	0.2	1.425E-05	0.001
\({\gamma }_{1}\) VARI_ELGA/V8)	0.2	0.297258	0.001
\({\rho }_{9}\) VARI_ELGA/V31)	0.2	7.87472E-07	0.001
\({\gamma }_{9}\) VARI_ELGA/V32)	0.2	9.79517E-03	0.001
\({\rho }_{12}\) VARI_ELGA/V40)	0.2	1.309E-05	0.001
\({\gamma }_{12}\) VARI_ELGA/V41)	0.2	0.088585	0.001

The results are identical to those of modeling A, which is the expected result: the coefficients making it possible to take into account the effect of irradiation in work hardening are chosen to be zero here.