2. Benchmark solution#

2.1. Benchmark solution#

The reference solution is taken in non-regression on a fine quadratic 3D calculation: all the tests are therefore of type AUTRE_ASTER for displacements and constraints.

In flexure, we test:

  • Move DZ to node I

  • von Mises constraints SIEQ_NOEU, component VMIS at nodes C, E, and G

In traction, we test:

  • Move DX to Node I

  • von Mises constraints SIEQ_NOEU, component VMIS at nodes C, E, and G

2.2. Benchmark results#

Elasticity small deformations, in bending (modeling A), test case ssnv302a:

Location

NOM_CHAM

NOM_CMP

Value (ssnv302 test)

Node I

DEPL

DZ

15.84 mm

Node C

SIEQ_NOEU

VMIS

180018 Pa

SIEF_NOEU

SIXX

-180032.Pa

Node E

SIEQ_NOEU

VMIS

120015 Pa

SIEF_NOEU

SIXX

-120000 Pa

G node

SIEQ_NOEU

VMIS

60032 Pa

SIEF_NOEU

SIXX

-60000 Pa

Elasticity, large deformations, in flexure (modeling B), test case ssnv302b:

Location

NOM_CHAM

NOM_CMP

Value (ssnv302 test)

Node I

DEPL

DZ

6.984 mm

Node C

SIEQ_NOEU

VMIS

96137 Pa

Node E

SIEQ_NOEU

VMIS

53027Pa

G node

SIEQ_NOEU

VMIS

22960Pa

Plasticity, small deformations, in traction (C modeling), ssnv302c test case:

Location

NOM_CHAM

NOM_CMP

Value (ssnv302 test)

Node I

DEPL

DZ

0.035mm

Node C

SIEQ_NOEU

VMIS

10000092 Pa

SIEF_NOEU

SIXX

10000151 Pa

Node E

SIEQ_NOEU

VMIS

10000000Pa

SIEF_NOEU

SIXX

10000000Pa

G node

SIEQ_NOEU

VMIS

10000000Pa

SIEF_NOEU

SIXX

10000000Pa

2.3. Uncertainty about the solution#

Numerical solutions in non-regression on a fine quadratic 3D mesh.