2. Benchmark solution#

2.1. Calculation method used for the reference solution#

The reference solution is analytical.

Transition from the initial state to the deformed state:

_images/Object_5.svg

where

\(a\) is the length of the deformation of the plate following \(Y\),

\({a}_{0}\) is the initial length of the plate,

\(b\) is the thickness of the deformed plate,

\({b}_{0}\) is the initial thickness of the plate.

Because

_images/Object_6.svg

and shell hypotheses, we have

_images/Object_7.svg

Green-Lagrange tensor:

By definition of the Green-Lagrange tensor, we have

_images/Object_8.svg

With

_images/Object_9.svg

, so we have

_images/Object_10.svg

By substituting, we have

_images/Object_11.svg

Deformation gradient:

By definition:

_images/Object_12.svg

Either

_images/Object_13.svg

Piola-Kirchhoff constraints of the second kind:

Let \(S\) be the constraint of \(\mathit{PK2}\), in our case,

_images/Object_14.svg

Cauchy constraint

Let \(s\) be the Cauchy stress tensor, we have the relationship

_images/Object_15.svg

, we deduce then that

_images/Object_16.svg

2.2. Benchmark results#

We calculate the \(\mathit{DX}\) and \(\mathit{DY}\) displacements at the node \(\mathit{NO3}\), the constraints of \(\mathit{PK2}\) and the Cauchy constraints on the mesh \(\mathit{M1}\).

2.3. Uncertainty about the solution#

Analytical result.

2.4. Bibliographical references#

Nil.