2. Modeling A#

The list of moments is used to control the Norton-Hoff regularization method by means of a coefficient \(t\), (\(m=1+{\text{10}}^{1-t}\)), and not the evolution of the load as during an ordinary calculation.

To perform a calculation in code_aster in limit analysis with the Norton-Hoff-Friaâ regularization method with the vonMises resistance criterion, it is necessary:

  • define the 2D (plane or axis) or 3D model with the almost incompressible finite elements, 3D models_ INCO_UPG, D_ PLAN_INCO_UPG, or AXIS_INCO_UPG;

  • ensure the incompressibility condition: GONF =0 in AFFE_CHAR_MECA;

  • define only the characteristic of the material \({s}_{y}\), the limit load being independent of

    _images/Object_43.svg

and \(\mathrm{\nu }\);

  • define the permanent load and the one set by \(\lambda\);

  • define discretization in time, (in practice between \({t}_{\mathit{min}}=1\) and \({t}_{\mathit{max}}=2\) to \(5\));

  • perform a non-linear calculation with the behavior relationship NORTON_HOFF with the command STAT_NON_LINE [U4.51.03], and the control ANA_LIM. In practice, linear research can be used to improve convergence and the subdivision of the time step;

  • post-process the calculation to get the load limit with the POST_ELEM [U4.81.22] command.

2.1. Characteristics of modeling#

We consider a cylinder modelled by incompressible axisymmetric elements of type QUAD8.

2.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

Number of knots: 141

Number of meshes: 51

Type of mesh: 34 meshes of type QUAD8incompressible; 17 meshes of type SEG3pour when applying pressure.

_images/100002010000032000000243A3A4CAE37FDC21AA.png

2.3. Tested sizes and results#

With the mesh in question, the calculation of the test case is stopped at \(t=\mathrm{2,450}s\). Additional details on the calculation are provided in the user support document [U2.05.04].

The Norton-Hoff coefficient corresponding to this moment is \(m=\mathrm{1,0355}\).

The table below shows the extraction of the values of \(\mathrm{\lambda }\) at certain times when the calculation is stopped, as well as the comparison with the reference values.

Modeling

Estimated upper value

Estimated lower value

EDF

\(t=2\)

\(m=\mathrm{1,1}\)

\(\mathrm{3,94863}\)

\(\mathrm{3,27091}\)

\(t=\mathrm{2,125}\)

\(m=\mathrm{1,0750}\)

\(\mathrm{3,93504}\)

\(\mathrm{3,40992}\)

\(t=\mathrm{2,25}\)

\(m=\mathrm{1,0562}\)

\(\mathrm{3,92505}\)

\(\mathrm{3,52215}\)

\(t=\mathrm{2,450}\)

\(m=\mathrm{1,0355}\)

\(\mathrm{3,91429}\)

\(\mathrm{3,65061}\)

Univ. of Liège/ LTAS

\(\mathrm{3,931}\)

nought

Research Center FZJ

nought

\(\mathrm{3,997}\)

Value tested

Reference - SOURCE_EXTERNE

Accuracy

CHAR_LIMI_SUPà \(t=2\)

\(\mathrm{3,931}\)

\(\mathrm{0,01}\)