3. Modeling A#

3.1. Characteristics of modeling#

Modeling 3D

_images/10001B50000069D500003EF142C9AB04ECD95C81.svg

3.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

The mesh contains 1 element of type HEXA8.

3.3. Quantities tested and results of modeling A#

Identification

Reference

Test

Tolerance

\(\varepsilon\) out of \(\mathit{NO1}\) to \(t\mathrm{=}\mathrm{1s}\)

0.07830

ANALYTIQUE

0.11%

\(\gamma\) on \(\mathit{NO1}\) to \(t\mathrm{=}\mathrm{1s}\)

0.11700

ANALYTIQUE

0.20%

\(p\) out of \(\mathit{NO1}\) to \(t\mathrm{=}\mathrm{1s}\)

0.15260

ANALYTIQUE

0.10%

\({\sigma }_{11}\) out of \(\mathit{NO1}\) to \(t\mathrm{=}\mathrm{1s}\)

409.70700

ANALYTIQUE

0.05%

The parameters of the result data structure are also tested:

Identification

Reference

Test

Tolerance

INSTpour NUME_ORDRE =8

1

ANALYTIQUE

0%

ITER_GLOB for NUME_ORDRE =8

4

NON_REGRESSION

0%

3.4. notes#

We would expect better correlation, but it should be noted that library NAG uses the function

_images/Object_22.svg

in algebraic form, while*Code_Aster* uses it in the form of a curve given point by point.

In addition, it seems that integrating the threshold function rate is causing problems for NAG, regardless of the precision otherwise required (the threshold value

_images/Object_23.svg

being significantly different from 0 at the end of integration). However, we can note the consistency of this correlation throughout the integration

_images/Object_24.svg

.