4. Summary of results#
The table shows the main drawbars found in the reference model and the two models shown.
Tirant |
Strength [N] |
\({A}_{s}\) [] |
Length [m] |
Total steel [] |
||
Reference |
T1 |
1.07E+06 |
2.69E-03 |
3 |
0.0215 |
|
T2 |
1.33E+06 |
2.4E-03 |
5,6 |
|||
C_ PLAN |
SCHEMA = “SECTION” |
T1 |
1.27E+06 |
2.54E-03 |
1.81 |
0.0203 |
Q3 |
3.49E+05 |
6.99E-04 |
2.75 |
|||
T5 |
3.74E-01 |
1.00E-06 |
3.84 |
|||
T2 |
1.26E+06 |
2.52E-03 |
5.35 |
|||
T6 |
4.34E-01 |
1.00E-06 |
5.45 |
|||
T4 |
1.08E+05 |
2.15E-04 |
1.47 |
|||
T7 |
1.22E-01 |
1.00E-06 |
6.37 |
|||
T8 |
2.30E-01 |
1.00E-06 |
5.80 |
|||
T9 |
1.00E+00 |
1.00E-06 |
4.20 |
|||
T10 |
1.09E-01 |
1.00E-06 |
4.25 |
|||
T11 |
4.13E-01 |
1.00E-06 |
1.47 |
|||
SCHEMA = “TOPO” |
T2 |
1.33E+06 |
2.65E-03 |
1.81 |
0.0205 |
|
T1 |
1.34E+06 |
2.68E-03 |
5.35 |
|||
Q3 |
2.59E+05 |
5.17E-04 |
2.75 |
|||
D_ PLAN |
SCHEMA = “SECTION” |
T1 |
3.19E+06 |
6.39E-03 |
6.55 |
0.042 |
T2 |
4.29E-02 |
1.00E-06 |
5.09 |
|||
Q3 |
5.72E-03 |
1.00E-06 |
6.37 |
|||
T4 |
9.31E-04 |
1.00E-06 |
5.80 |
|||
T5 |
3.10E-02 |
1.00E-06 |
4.20 |
|||
T6 |
9.44E-05 |
1.00E-06 |
1.47 |
|||
SCHEMA = “TOPO” |
T1 |
2.73E+06 |
5.47E-03 |
5.09 |
0.057 |
|
T2 |
2.28E+06 |
4.56E-03 |
4.20 |
|||
Q3 |
1.00E+06 |
2.00E-03 |
5.02 |
Table 4-1 : Summary of results
Table 4-1 shows the pull elements that have a section size greater than the minimum cross section. The total quantity of steel is calculated taking into account all the pulling elements.
The C_ PLAN modeling presents a variation of 6% compared to the solution proposed in reference [Schlaich et al., 1987]. The results obtained by Code_Aster are non-regression values.