3. Modeling A#
3.1. Characteristics of modeling and meshing#
Line element: POU_D_TGM.
Mechanical characteristics of the section (units homogeneous to meters):
\(A\) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0e-04 |
2.666667e-08 |
1.066667e-07 |
1.191790e+00 |
1.172840e+00 |
7.093682e-08 |
7.093682e-08 |
1.438125e-12 |
Loading at point \(B\).
\(\mathrm{Fx}\) |
|
|
|
Instant 1 |
|
|
|
Instant 2 |
|
|
|
At time 1 the section remains elastic, at time 2 the section is partially plasticized.
3.2. Fiber numbering#
The main inertia coordinate system \((\mathrm{Y0},\mathrm{Z0})\) of the beam must be rotated by 90° for the greatest inertia \(\mathrm{IZ}\) to be along the \(Y\) axis of the global coordinate system. The aim is to test the ORIENTATION keyword from the AFFE_CARA_ELEM command.
In the local frame of reference of the beam |
In the global study benchmark |
Several « types » of fibers are used:
fibers whose numbers range from 1 to 32. They are assigned a non-zero area in the command file,
fibers whose numbers are 33, 34, 34, 35, 36. They are located at the 4 corners of the section. These fibers, in the command file, are assigned a cross section equal to zero. They are only used for post-processing,
fibers whose numbers range from 37 to 60. They are located on the outer edge of the section. These fibers, in the command file, are assigned a cross section equal to zero. They are only used for post-processing.
3.3. Tested sizes and results#
The quantity tested and analyzed is SIEF_ELGA, at the first Gauss point of element \(\text{E00200}\). It is the Gauss point closest to the embedment, \(\mathrm{Lo}=\mathrm{2.95491933m}\).
3.3.1. Elastic behavior#
Gauss point constraints: SIEF_ELGA
The constraints calculated by equation [éq 2.1-1] and by*Code_Aster* are given in the two tables below (values in \(\text{MPa}\)). The layout of the tables is based on the fiber layout diagram in the global coordinate system. The most used fiber is No. 36 with a constraint of \(\mathrm{390 }\text{MPa}\).
Stresses calculated in fibers by equation [éq 2.1-1] |
Stresses calculated in fibers by*Code_Aster*. |
The relative error between the two calculations is given in the table below. Whatever the fiber, it is still less than \(0.095\text{\%}\).
-0.022% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.026% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.014% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.010% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.013% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.014% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.014% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.015% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.015% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.015% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.2. Plastic behavior#
Gauss point constraints: SIEF_ELGA
The table below gives the stress values, after partial plasticization of the section, obtained with*Code_Aster*. The behavior of the material is « almost perfect » elasto-plastic, the work-hardening slope is low. The maximum stress, which is beyond the elastic limit, therefore remains very close to the elastic threshold of \(\mathrm{400MPa}\).
8 |
79 |
223 |
36 |
366 |
400 |
400 |
-16 |
55 |
199 |
199 |
342 |
400 |
400 |
-64 |
7 |
151 |
151 |
294 |
400 |
400 |
-112 |
-41 |
103 |
103 |
246 |
390 |
400 |
-160 |
-89 |
55 |
55 |
198 |
342 |
400 |
-208 |
-137 |
7 |
7 |
150 |
294 |
365 |
-256 |
-185 |
-41 |
41 |
102 |
246 |
317 |
-305 |
-233 |
-89 |
-89 |
54 |
198 |
269 |
-353 |
-281 |
-137 |
-137 |
6 |
150 |
221 |
-377 |
-305 |
-161 |
-161 |
-18 |
126 |
197 |
This calculation is carried out for the Code_Aster non-regression test.