6. D modeling#

Calculate with CALC_G and POST_K1_K2_K3 in 3D for modes 1 and 3.

6.1. Characteristics of modeling#

_images/10000000000002EC000002429D32A376464251EB.png

The following boundary conditions are applied successively:

  • traction: as for modeling B;

  • twisting.

This modeling makes it possible to test the calculation of \(\mathrm{K1}\) and \(\mathrm{K3}\) combined using POST_K1_K2_K3 (method for extrapolating movements on the lips of the crack).

The middle nodes of the edges of the elements touching the bottom of the crack are moved to a quarter of these edges, to obtain better precision.

6.2. Characteristics of the mesh#

Number of knots: 6536

Number of meshes and type: 432 PENTA15 and 987 HEXA20

The middle nodes of the edges of the elements touching the bottom of the crack are moved to a quarter of these edges, to obtain better precision.

6.3. note#

Both load cases (traction and torsion) are taken into account. It is therefore necessary to combine the values of \(G\) for both loads.

So

\(G(s)\mathrm{=}(11.586+7.356)\mathrm{=}18.943J\mathrm{/}{m}^{2}\)

Only traction contributes to \(\mathrm{K1}\), only twisting contributes to \(\mathrm{K3}\).

6.4. Tested sizes and results#

Identification

Method

Location

Location

Reference Type

\(\text{\%}\) Tolerance

G

CALC_GLegendre

Node 49

18.94

ANALYTIQUE

3.0

G

CALC_GLegendre

Node 1710

18.94

ANALYTIQUE

2.0

G

CALC_GLegendre

Node 77

18.94

ANALYTIQUE

3.0

K1

POST_K1_K1_K3

Node 49

1.596 106

ANALYTIQUE

1.0

K1

POST_K1_K1_K3

Node 1710

1.596 106

ANALYTIQUE

1.0

K1

POST_K1_K1_K3

Node 77

1.596 106

ANALYTIQUE

2.0

K3

POST_K1_K1_K3

Node 49

1.064 106

ANALYTIQUE

2.0

K3

POST_K1_K1_K3

Node 1710

1.064 106

ANALYTIQUE

2.0

K3

POST_K1_K1_K3

Node 77

1.064 106

ANALYTIQUE

1.0

G

POST_K1_K1_K3

Node 49

18.94

ANALYTIQUE

2.0

G

POST_K1_K1_K3

Node 1710

18.94

ANALYTIQUE

2.0

G

POST_K1_K1_K3

Node 77

18.94

ANALYTIQUE

2.0