2. Benchmark solution#
2.1. Calculation method#
2.1.1. Behaviour of the massif#
Let \(\lambda\) be the deconfinement rate, which represents the relative position of the tunnel section in question in relation to the waist front. In the « convergence - confinement » method, the future excavated ground is replaced by an equivalent stress tensor, whose intensity is reduced via \(\lambda\) to simulate the digging and the distance from the waist front.
The solution of the problem is therefore similar to that of the infinitely thick tube loaded by an internal pressure of magnitude \((1\mathrm{-}\lambda ){\sigma }_{0}\) and by an external pressure of magnitude \({\sigma }_{0}\) (see [bib3] for the details of the calculations).
The radial and orthoradial stresses as well as the radial displacement at the wall of the tunnel in an elastic medium subjected to a deconfinement rate \(\lambda\) are as follows
\(\mathrm{\{}\begin{array}{c}{\sigma }_{R}\mathrm{=}(1\mathrm{-}\frac{\lambda \mathrm{\cdot }{R}^{2}}{{r}^{2}}){\sigma }^{0}\\ {\sigma }_{\theta }\mathrm{=}(1+\frac{\lambda \mathrm{\cdot }{R}^{2}}{{r}^{2}}){\sigma }^{0}\\ {U}_{R}\mathrm{=}\lambda \frac{{R}^{2}}{r}\mathrm{\cdot }\frac{{\sigma }^{0}}{\mathrm{2G}}\end{array}\)
\(G\) is the shear modulus given by the following relationship: \(G\mathrm{=}\frac{E}{2(1+\nu )}\).
2.1.2. Support behavior#
The support will oppose the natural convergence movement of the tunnel and thus apply artificial confinement to the rock.
Let \({K}_{s}\) be the stiffness of the support, it is given by the following relationship if we consider that the support is comparable to a thin tube (\({\nu }_{b}\) is the Poisson’s ratio of concrete):
\({K}_{s}\mathrm{=}\frac{{E}_{b}\mathrm{\cdot }e}{(1\mathrm{-}{\nu }_{b}^{2})\mathrm{\cdot }R}\)
If \({k}_{s}\mathrm{=}\frac{{K}_{s}}{2\mathrm{\cdot }G}\) represents the relative stiffness of the concrete in relation to the mass and \({\lambda }_{d}\) the deconfinement rate when the support is put in place, then the radial and orthoradial stresses as well as the radial displacement in the wall are given by [bia1]:
\(\mathrm{\{}\begin{array}{c}{\sigma }_{R}\mathrm{=}\frac{{k}_{s}}{1+{k}_{s}}(1\mathrm{-}{\lambda }_{d}){\sigma }_{0}\\ {\sigma }_{\theta }\mathrm{=}\frac{{k}_{s}}{1+{k}_{s}}(1+{\lambda }_{d}){\sigma }_{0}\\ {U}_{R}\mathrm{=}\frac{1+{\lambda }_{d}\mathrm{\cdot }{k}_{s}}{1+{k}_{s}}\mathrm{\cdot }\frac{{\sigma }_{0}}{\mathrm{2G}}\mathrm{\cdot }R\end{array}\)
2.2. Reference quantities and results#
The following quantities are tested at the level of the wall at points \(A\) and \(B\) of the figure in paragraph 1.1, at the moment when the lockdown is complete:
radial stress: \({\sigma }_{\mathit{yy}}\) in \(A\) or \({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\) in \(B\);
orthoradial stress: \({\sigma }_{\mathit{zz}}\) in \(A\) or \({\sigma }_{\mathit{yy}}\) in \(B\);
radial displacement: \({u}_{y}\) in \(A\) or \({u}_{z}\) in \(B\).
2.3. Uncertainty about the solution#
None. Exact analytical result.
2.4. Bibliographical references#
The calculation of tunnels by the convergence-confinement method, M. Panet, Presses de l’ENPC 1995
How do you simulate tunneling with*Code_Aster*? Principle of the method, implementation and validation, A. Courtois, A. Courtois, R., R. Saidani, P. Sémété, note EDF HT-25/02/045/A - 2002
Continuum mechanics, volume 2, J. Salençon, Ed. Ellipses - 1988