1. Modeling A#

1.1. But#

In this modeling, we want to validate the modelling/characteristic pairs DIS_T /K_T_D_N and DIS_T /A_T_D_N as well as the pairs DIS_T /K_T_D_L and DIS_T /A_T_D_L, in coordinate system GLOBAL and in coordinate system LOCAL. To do this, the tests EPX bm_str_resl_nl (calculation 1) and bm_str_resg_nl (calculation 2) are reproduced. This modeling also validates the use of circular beams in CALC_EPX.

1.2. Description#

1.2.1. Geometry and modeling#

_images/10000201000001E8000000EA67BAD9FBCB18491C.png _images/10000201000001E8000001329B6ED683EFA1B70C.png

System 1

System 2

Two systems are compared. In both cases it is a \(\mathit{AB}\) (POU_D_E) beam of length \(1m\) connected to a spring in \(B\). A mass of \(1000\mathit{kg}\) is also added to point \(B\). In the first system, the beam is connected to a point spring (DIS_T /K_T_D_N+A_T_D_N), in the second to a line spring \(\mathit{BC}\) oriented along \(Y\) (DIS_T /K_T_D_L+A_T_D_L).

Circular cross section of the beam: R = 0.02

Correspondence of node groups to the points shown in the figure above.

Points

System 1

System 2

A

T_0_0_0

P_0_0_0

P_0_0

B

T_1_0_0

P_1_0_0

C

P_1_L_0

1.2.2. Material properties#

Beam:

Young’s module: \(2E11\mathit{Pa}\)

Poisson’s ratio: \(0.\)

Density: \(7800\mathit{kg}/{m}^{3}\)

Springs/ shock absorbers:

Elements in local coordinate system (DIS_T/SEG2 of calculation 1 only):

Stiffness according to \(X\): \(75000.N/m\)

Stiffness according to \(Y\): \(60000.N/m\)

Stiffness according to \(Z\): \(50000.N/m\)

Depreciation according to \(X\): \(7500.N/(m/s)\)

Depreciation according to \(Y\): \(6000.N/(m/s)\)

Depreciation according to \(Z\): \(5000.N/(m/s)\)

Global coordinate system elements (DIS_T of calculation 2 and DIS_T/POI1 of calculation 1):

Stiffness according to \(X\): \(60000.N/m\)

Stiffness according to \(Y\): \(75000.N/m\)

Stiffness according to \(Z\): \(50000.N/m\)

Depreciation according to \(X\): \(6000.N/(m/s)\)

Depreciation according to \(Y\): \(7500.N/(m/s)\)

Depreciation according to \(Z\): \(5000.N/(m/s)\)

1.2.3. Boundary conditions and loads#

Node \(A\) is embedded for both systems. For system 2, node \(C\) is also embedded. Two calculations are carried out.

Calculation 1:

In both systems, a constant force with a value of \(1000N\) is imposed in \(B\) according to \(Y\).

Calculation 2:

In both systems, constant forces with a value of \(1000N\) are imposed according to \(X\), \(Y\), and \(Z\) in \(B\).

1.2.4. Reference values#

The reference values are given by the EUROPLEXUS tests mentioned in 1.1.

1.3. Tested values#

1.3.1. Calculus 1#

GROUP_NO

NUME_ORDRE

Component

Reference

Reference Value

P_1_0_0

91609

\(\mathit{DY}\)

SOURCE_EXTERNE

3.52220E-03

T_1_0_0

91609

91609

\(\mathit{DY}\)

SOURCE_EXTERNE

1.29492E-02

1.3.2. Calcul2#

GROUP_NO

NUME_ORDRE

Component

Reference

Reference Value

P_1_0_0

25064

\(\mathit{DX}\)

SOURCE_EXTERNE

-1.62766E-05

T_1_0_0

25064

\(\mathit{DX}\)

SOURCE_EXTERNE

-1.62766E-05

P_1_0_0

25064

\(\mathit{DY}\)

SOURCE_EXTERNE

3.67804E-03

T_1_0_0

25064

\(\mathit{DY}\)

SOURCE_EXTERNE

3.67804E-03

P_1_0_0

25064

\(\mathit{DZ}\)

SOURCE_EXTERNE

4.58138E-03

T_1_0_0

25064

\(\mathit{DZ}\)

SOURCE_EXTERNE

4.58138E-03