B and C models
====================


Characteristic of modeling
----------------------------------

Hardware point modeling, in large deformations, with implicit integration (ALGO_INTE =' NEWTON_PERT ').

We also test up to :math:`t=\mathrm{2000h}`: ALGO_INTE =' RUNGE_KUTTA ', in large deformations.


Tested sizes and results
------------------------------

     Comparison with modeling A:

     for ALGO_INTE =' NEWTON_PERT ':


.. csv-table::

    "**Identification**", "**Moments (** :math:`h` **)**", "**Reference**", "**Tolerance**"
    ":math:`\mathit{EPYY}` ", "2000", "0.020895", "0"
    ":math:`\mathit{EPYY}` ", "4000", "0.050575", "0"
    ":math:`\mathit{V11}(\mathit{endo})` ", "2000", "0.032175", "0"
    ":math:`\mathit{V11}(\mathit{endo})` ", "4000", "0.067927", "0"


.. csv-table::

    ":math:`\mathit{dEPYY}/\mathit{dt}` ", "1520", "6,64091E-6", "0"


for ALGO_INTE =' RUNGE_KUTTA ':


.. csv-table::

    "**Identification**", "**Moments (** :math:`h` **)**", "**Reference**", "**Tolerance**"
    ":math:`\mathit{EPYY}` ", "2000", "0.020895"," 0.5%"
    ":math:`\mathit{V11}(\mathit{endo})` ", "2000", "0.032175", "0.5"