D modeling
==============

This modeling is identical to the C modeling.

The only difference is that a topological enrichment is chosen here (a single layer of elements enriched at the bottom of the crack).

Only the crack tilted at 30° is modelled.


Tested sizes and results
------------------------------


.. csv-table::

    "**Identification**", "**Reference**", "**Tolerance**"
    "CALC_G ", "", ""
    "C1 + background1: K1", "1.9294 105"," 0.5%"
    "C1 + background2: K1", "1.9294 105"," 0.5%"
    "C1 + background1: K2", "1.1139.105"," 3.0%"
    "C1 + background2: K2", "1.1139.105"," 3.0%"
    "C1 + background1: G", "0.215"," 4.0%"
    "C1 + background2: G", "0.215"," 4.0%"
    "C2 + background1: K1", "1.9294 105"," 0.5%"
    "C2 + background2: K1", "1.9294 105"," 0.5%"
    "C2 + background1: K2", "1.1139.105"," 3.0%"
    "C2 + background2: K2", "1.1139.105"," 3.0%"
    "C2 + background1: G", "0.215"," 4.0%"
    "C2 + background2: G", "0.215"," 4.0%"
    "POST_K1_K2_K3 ", "", ""
    "C1 + background1: K1", "1.9294 105"," 6.0%"
    "C1 + background2: K1", "1.9294 105"," 6.0%"
    "C1 + background1: K2", "1,139 105"," 6.0%"
    "C1 + background 2: K2", "1,139 105"," 6.0%"
    "C2 + background1: K1", "1.9294 105"," 6.0%"
    "C2 + background2: K1", "1.9294 105"," 6.0%"
    "C2 + background 1: K2", "1,139 105"," 6.0%"
    "C2 + background 2: K2", "1,139 105"," 6.0%"