Modeling A -------------- .. _Toc93483755: Characteristics of modeling ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ According to the preliminary study, the extremities of the surface are determined break and configure ``X1_ MINI = X1_ = X1_ MAXI = 3.0`` and ``X2_ MINI = X2_ MAXI =13.4`` in order to speed up the calculation. Finding the optimal radius with the terminals of the search space automatically determined by the macro command. We take advantage of the CALC_STAB_PENTE mesh adaptation feature to improve the accuracy of the FS. Refinement stops until "NB_RAFF_MAXI = 4" since beyond the 4th refinement the FS does not change significantly. At the exit of CALC_STAB_PENTE, we obtained the fracture surface shown in :numref:`fig4-modeleA`. .. figure:: images/10000000000002E80000014375F37B521F4DCBED.png :name: FIG4-ModelA :width: 70% **Break surface from CALC_STAB_PENTE** .. _RefImage_10000000000002E80000014375F37B521F4DCBED.png: .. _Toc93483756: Tested sizes and results ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The safety factor is tested at the last refinement of the mesh. The results are shown in :ref:`Tableau 1`. .. _table1_v603006 : **Table 1**: FS reference values (Modeling A) .. csv-table:: :name: tab-1 :header-rows: 1 :widths: auto :align: center "**NUME_RAFF**", "**Identification**", "**Aster Result**", "**Reference Value**", "**Error**" "4", "FS", "1.5469235715723666", "1.534", "0.84%" The error of CALC_STAB_PENTE is of the same order of magnitude as that of `Plaxis2D` (0.4%) compared to the result of the literature. This error is explained by: * The different discretizations of the space of geometric variables of the fracture surface. * The various hypotheses on the shape of the base of the slices. In CALC_STAB_PENTE the base is circular. The angle of inclination is measured by the derivative of the equation of the circle at the center of the base. * Numerical error produced when calculating the self-weights of the slices. Summary of results ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The FS result from macro command CALC_STAB_PENTE gives the difference of 0.84% compared to the reference solution. This proves the relevance of the result of the Bishop method and the associated optimization algorithm in CALC_STAB_PENTE.