Model A results
==============================


Tested values
---------------

The parameters of the result data structure are tested:


.. csv-table::

    "**Identification**", "**Reference**", "**Test**", "**Tolerance**"
    "INSTpour NUME_ORDRE =10", "10.0"," ANALYTIQUE ", "0.10%"
    "ITER_GLOB ", "8"," NON_REGRESSION "," 0.00%"


Weibull model:


.. csv-table::

    "**Identification**", "**Reference**", "**T** type", "**Tolerance**"
    "Weibull constraint for :math:`\mathit{INST}=\mathrm{2,0}` ", "1.4075E+003"," CASTEM2000 ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Weibull constraint for :math:`\mathit{INST}=\mathrm{4,0}` ", "2.4966E+003"," CASTEM2000 ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Weibull constraint for :math:`\mathit{INST}=\mathrm{6,0}` ", "3.3332E+003"," CASTEM2000 ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Weibull constraint for :math:`\mathit{INST}=\mathrm{8,0}` ", "3.7535E+003"," CASTEM2000 ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Weibull constraint for :math:`\mathit{INST}=\mathrm{10,0}` ", "4.0474E+003"," CASTEM2000 ", "0.1% (relative)"


The Weibull stress obtained with the 2 commands (POST_ELEM and POST_BEREMIN) with option SIGM_ELGA for small deformations are compared to the figure below:


.. image:: images/100000000000034A000002538D22BD816936863D.jpg
    :width: 5.9055in
    :height: 4.1728in


.. _RefImage_100000000000034A000002538D22BD816936863D.jpg:

The Weibull stress obtained with the 2 commands (POST_ELEM and POST_BEREMIN) with option SIGM_ELGA for the large deformations are compared to the figure below:

Note: in large logarithmic deformations (GDEF_LOG), the macro command POST_BEREMIN uses the specific constraint field :math:`T`, while the macro command POST_ELEM uses the Cauchy stress field :math:`\mathrm{\sigma }` (see [:ref:`R5.03.24 <R5.03.24>`]).


.. image:: images/100000000000034A00000253AEE49FFA401D0D47.jpg
    :width: 5.9047in
    :height: 4.172in


.. _RefImage_100000000000034A00000253AEE49FFA401D0D47.jpg:

The Weibull stress obtained with the 2 commands (POST_ELEM and POST_BEREMIN) with option SIGM_ELMOY for small deformations are compared to the figure below:


.. image:: images/100000000000034A000002539CB1BB2A4E5D111B.jpg
    :width: 5.9055in
    :height: 4.1728in


.. _RefImage_100000000000034A000002539CB1BB2A4E5D111B.jpg:

Rice-Tracey model:


.. csv-table::

    "**Identification**", "**Reference**", "**Type**", "**Tolerance**"
    "Cavity growth rate for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{1,0}` ", "1.0000E+000"," ZEBULON ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Cavity volume for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{1,0}` ", "3.7500E+000"," ZEBULON ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Cavity growth rate for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{3,0}` ", "1.0014E+000"," ZEBULON ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Cavity volume for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{3,0}` ", "6.2372E-001"," ZEBULON ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Cavity growth rate for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{5,0}` ", "1.0076E+000"," ZEBULON ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Cavity growth rate for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{7,0}` ", "1.0170E+000"," ZEBULON ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Cavity growth rate for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{10,0}` ", "1.0315E+000"," ZEBULON ", "0.1% (relative)"


Bordet model:


.. csv-table::

    "**Identification**", "**Reference**", "**Test**", "**Tolerance**"
    "Bordet constraint for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{2,0}` ", "0.0000E+000"," NON_DEFINI ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Bordet stress for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{4,0}` ", "7.2180E+002"," NON_DEFINI ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Bordet constraint for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{6,0}` ", "1.3024E+003"," NON_DEFINI ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Bordet constraint for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{8,0}` ", "1.7305E+003"," NON_DEFINI ", "0.1% (relative)"
    "Bordet constraint for :math:`\mathit{INST}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{10,0}` ", "2.0225E+003"," NON_DEFINI ", "0.1% (relative)"