4. Results of modeling A#
4.1. Tested values#
Identification |
Reference |
Aster |
% difference |
Tolerance |
Point \(O\) |
||||
\(N5(\mathrm{0.,0}\mathrm{.,0}.)\) |
||||
\(t=0.1s\) |
1.05137 |
1.04934 |
-0.193 |
|
\(t=0.2s\) |
1.24768 |
1.24181 |
-0.471 |
|
\(t=0.3s\) |
1.45136 |
1.44378 |
-0.522 |
|
\(t=0.5s\) |
1.73684 |
1.72955 |
-0.420 |
|
\(t=0.7s\) |
1.88010 |
1.87516 |
-0.263 |
|
\(t=1.0s\) |
1.96406 |
1.96191 |
-0.110 |
|
\(t=1.2s\) |
1.98398 |
1.98282 |
-0.059 |
|
Point \(H\) |
||||
\(N1075(\mathrm{0.5,0}\mathrm{.8,1}.0)\) |
||||
\(t=0.1s\) |
1.33579 |
1.32490 |
-0.816 |
|
\(t=0.2s\) |
1.61081 |
1.60337 |
-0.462 |
|
\(t=0.3s\) |
1.75959 |
1.75424 |
-0.304 |
|
\(t=0.5s\) |
1.90017 |
1.89718 |
-0.157 |
|
\(t=0.7s\) |
1.95657 |
1.95478 |
-0.091 |
|
\(t=1.0s\) |
1.98723 |
1.98646 |
-0.039 |
|
\(t=1.2s\) |
1.99433 |
1.99391 |
-0.021 |
|