4. Results of modeling A#
4.1. Tested values#
Identification |
Reference |
Aster |
Relative difference (%) |
Absolute deviation (°C) |
||
difference |
tolerance |
difference |
tolerance |
|||
Temperatures: |
||||||
In the center (\(O:\mathrm{N291}\)) |
\(T(°C)\) |
|||||
t = 400 s |
334 |
340.56 |
1.965% |
|
6.56 |
|
t = 600 s |
500 |
493.15 |
1.371% |
|
6.85 |
|
t = 800 s |
618 |
610.27 |
1.252% |
|
7.73 |
|
t = 1000 s |
706 |
700.18 |
0.824% |
|
5.82 |
|
t = 1200 s |
774 |
769.35 |
0.600% |
|
4.65 |
|
t = 1400 s |
828 |
822.57 |
0.656% |
|
5.43 |
|
t = 1600 s |
872 |
863.33 |
0.994% |
|
8.67 |
|
t = 1800 s |
902 |
894.73 |
0.806% |
|
7.27 |
|
t = 2000 s |
923 |
918.91 |
0.443% |
|
4.09 |
|
t = 2200 s |
942 |
937.54 |
0.474% |
|
4.46 |
|
t = 2400s |
956 |
951.89 |
0.430% |
|
4.11 |
|
On the surface (\(A:\mathrm{N292}\)) |
\(T(°C)\) |
|||||
t = 400 s |
461 |
474.82 |
2.998% |
|
13.8 |
|
t = 600 s |
608 |
596.37 |
1.913% |
|
11.6 |
|
t = 800 s |
696 |
689.64 |
0.914% |
|
6.36 |
|
t = 1000 s |
774 |
761.24 |
1.648% |
|
12.8 |
|
t = 1200 s |
828 |
816.33 |
1.410% |
|
11.7 |
|
t = 1400 s |
868 |
858.70 |
1.071% |
|
9.30 |
|
t = 1600 s |
902 |
891.16 |
1.202% |
|
10.8 |
|
t = 1800 s |
923 |
916.17 |
0.741% |
|
6.83 |
|
t = 2000 s |
942 |
935.42 |
0.698% |
|
6.58 |
|
t = 2200 s |
956 |
950.26 |
0.601% |
|
5.74 |
|
t = 2400s |
962 |
961.69 |
0.033% |
|
0.314 |
4.2. notes#
Relative differences are greater than 2% for \(t=400.s\), lower for \(t\ge 600.s\)
On the surface, the results calculated by*Code_Aster* are symmetric with respect to the \(\mathrm{AC}\) diagonal. The maximum difference observed, in relative as well as in absolute terms, is 0.29%, or \(1.4°C\), between point \(A\) (\(\mathrm{N291}\)) and point \(D\) (\(\mathrm{N179}\)) at the moment \(t=400.s\). These differences decrease in absolute value as time increases.