C modeling ============== Characteristics of modeling ------------------------------------ Same as modeling A except for the 3D_ INCO_UPG elements. Characteristics of the mesh ---------------------------- Number of knots: 9967 Number of meshes and type: 864 PENTA15 and 1568 HEXA20 The characteristic length of an element near the crack bottom is :math:`\mathrm{0,06}m`. The middle nodes of the edges of the elements touching the bottom of the crack are moved to a quarter of these edges. Tested sizes and results ------------------------------ The theta field integration crowns for command CALC_G are: :math:`\text{RINF}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{0,1}m` and :math:`\text{RSUP}\mathrm{=}\mathrm{0,5}m`. We choose a LINEAIRE type of straightening. The parameter ABS_CURV_MAXI of the POST_K1_K2_K3 operator is chosen so as to retain 5 nodes on the extrapolation segment. To test the value of :math:`{K}_{I}` for all points at the bottom of the crack, we test the :math:`\mathit{min}` and the :math:`\mathit{max}` values along the bottom. :math:`{K}_{\mathit{II}}` is tested only to the point where :math:`\omega \mathrm{=}0°` (where :math:`{K}_{\mathit{II}}` is normally maximum). :math:`{K}_{\mathit{III}}` is tested only to the point where :math:`\omega \mathrm{=}90°` (where :math:`{K}_{\mathit{III}}` is normally maximum). Theoretically, you should test the absolute value of :math:`{K}_{\mathit{II}}` and :math:`{K}_{\mathit{III}}` because the sign is arbitrary. Values from CALC_G ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The values are in :math:`\mathit{Pa}\mathrm{.}\sqrt{m}` obtained from the SSLV154A test case. .. csv-table:: "**Identification**", "**Reference Type**", "**Reference Value**", "**% Tolerance**" ":math:`\mathit{max}({K}_{I})` ", "'ANALYTIQUE'", "8,361 105"," 3%" ":math:`\mathit{min}({K}_{I})` ", "'ANALYTIQUE'", "8,361 105"," 1%" ":math:`{K}_{\mathit{II}}` in :math:`\omega \mathrm{=}0°` ", "'ANALYTIQUE'", "8,644 105"," 4.5%" ":math:`{K}_{\mathit{III}}` in :math:`\omega \mathrm{=}90°` ", "'ANALYTIQUE'", "6,747 105"," 3%"