Summary of results
======================

**D_Plan**


.. csv-table::

    "", "", "", "**modelling**", ""
    "**Summary of max errors in %**", "", "**A**", "**A**", "**B**", "**C**"
    "Travel", "A, B
    C, D
    E, F", "0.08
    0.51
    0.11", "0.04
    0.04
    0.04", "0.05
    0.05
    0.05"
    "Constraints
    :math:`{\sigma }_{\mathrm{xx}}` ", "A, B
    C, D
    E, F", "6.04
    10.84
    17.46", "0.29
    0.17
    4.10—4", "0.27
    0.32
    2.10—4"
    "Constraints
    :math:`{\sigma }_{\mathrm{yy}}` ", "A, B
    C, D
    E, F", "3.61
    0.72
    27.07", "0.38
    0.63
    2.10—5", "0.16
    0.14
    5.5.10—4"
    "Constraints
    :math:`{\sigma }_{\mathrm{zz}}` ", "A, B
    C, D
    E, F", "1.33
    8.51
    22.27", "0.16
    0.63
    2.10—4", "0.02
    0.02
    2.10—4"
    "Constraints
    :math:`{\sigma }_{\mathrm{xy}}` ", "A, B
    C, D
    E, F", "-
    4.99
    2.11", "-
    0.50
    0.23", "-
    0.2
    0.2"


These 3 models have substantially the same number of nodes; the results obtained with elements of order 1 (modeling A in TRIA3 and QUAD4) are much less accurate, especially on the inner wall.