3. Modeling A#
3.1. Characteristics of modeling#
3D
Cutout: |
3 in height |
2 in width and thickness |
|
hexa20 meshes |
Boundary conditions: |
\(\mathrm{DX}=\mathrm{DY}=0\) out of \(\left]\mathrm{AB}\right]\), \(\mathrm{DY}=0\) in \(D\), \(\mathrm{DZ}=0\) in \(A\) |
Node names: |
\(\mathrm{Point}A=\mathrm{N59}\) |
|
\(\mathrm{Point}C=\mathrm{N12}\) |
|
|
\(\mathrm{Point}E=\mathrm{N56}\) |
3.2. Characteristics of the mesh#
Number of knots: 111
Number of meshes and types: 12 HEXA20
3.3. Tested sizes and results#
Location |
Value type \((m)\) |
Reference |
Point \(B\) |
\({U}_{B}\) |
|
\({V}_{B}\) |
||
\({W}_{B}\) |
—1.721655 10—6 |
|
Point \(C\) |
\({U}_{C}\) |
|
\({V}_{C}\) |
||
\({W}_{C}\) |
—1.707308 10—6 |
|
Point \(D\) |
\({U}_{D}\) |
—1.721655 10—7 |
\({V}_{D}\) |
||
\({W}_{D}\) |
1.434713 10—8 |
|
Point \(E\) |
\({U}_{E}\) |
|
\({V}_{E}\) |
||
\({W}_{E}\) |
—1.291241 10—6 |
|
(Pa) |
||
Point \(A\) |
|
2.29554 105 |
Point \(E\) |
|
1.14777 105 |
Results from MACR_LIGN_COUP on the AB segment:
The NON_REGRESSIONsont tests done on the tables from MACR_LIGN_COUP applied to a CHAMP_GD. They are the “AUTRE_ASTER” reference values for tables from MACR_LIGN_COUP applied to a mult_elas result.
Location |
Size |
Reference Value e |
Reference Type |
Precision |
Point \(E\): ABSC_CURV = 1.5 |
Field DEPL, Comp. DZ |
“NON_REGRESSION” |
||
Point \(B\): ABSC_CURV = 3 |
Field DEPL, Comp. DZ |
“NON_REGRESSION” |
||
Point \(E\): ABSC_CURV = 1.5 |
Field DEPL, Comp. DZ |
-1.29126028028088E-06 |
“AUTRE_ASTER” |
0.1% |
Point \(B\): ABSC_CURV = 3 |
Field DEPL, Comp. DZ |
-1.72167375533E-06 |
“AUTRE_ASTER” |
0.1% |
3.4. notes#
Modeling in HEXA20 is completely acceptable for this rough meshing. This modeling also makes it possible to test whether the application of gravity to a list of cells or groups of cells is properly taken into account.