Benchmark solution ===================== Calculation method used for the reference solution -------------------------------------------------------- The modal analysis is carried out with the code SAMCEF. The spectral modal analysis is carried out with the code CASTEM 2000. Benchmark results ---------------------- * Natural frequencies and modes calculated with SAMCEF. * Axial, tangential, and normal displacements along the wall located in plane :math:`\mathrm{xOz}` (:math:`x` and :math:`z` positive) for modal recombinations :math:`\mathrm{CQC}` and :math:`\mathrm{SRSS}`. (Calculated taking into account 4 modes). In order to improve the identification of modes, the spectrum is evaluated with a Fourier model. This modeling was carried out with the software SAMCEF. Since the spectrum is very dense (200 modes with a frequency lower than :math:`7\mathit{Hz}`), the following table only shows frequencies lower than :math:`4\mathrm{Hz}`. In this range, the cumulative effective mass according to :math:`z` is zero. .. csv-table:: "**No.** **h** **harmonic**", "**Frequencies** (:math:`\mathit{Hz}`)" "4", "1.14" "5", "1.17" "3", "1.24" "4", "1.35" "6", "1.45" "5", "1.50" "2", "1.53" "6", "1.62" "7", "1.70" "3", "1.73" "5", "1.93" "8", "1.96" "7", "2.03" "6", "2.09" "9", "2,26" "7", "2,28" "6", "2.42" "8", "2.45" "4", "2.47" "7", "2.55" "10", "2.60" "8", "2.67" "1", "2.80" "9", "2,82" "11", "2.98" "5", "3.01" "8", "3.04" "8", "3,10" "7", "3,10" "2", "3,20" "10", "3,21" "9", "3,29" "9", "3,37" "12", "3.40" "6", "3.56" "11", "3.65" "9", "3,70" "10", "3,80" "3", "3,81" "8", "3.83" "13", "3.86" "9", "3,91" Uncertainty about the solution --------------------------- Comparisons between codes. Bibliographical references --------------------------- The test case is based on the following reference: 1. P.L. GOULD and S.H. ABU - SITTA. *Dynamic response of structures to wind and earthquake loading.* PENTECH PRESS, 1980.