Reference problem ===================== Geometry --------- We consider a floor column resulting from the sdnx100 test case, whose main characteristics are described below: **The floor** .. image:: images/10000000000002D2000001D634DA637CBB3A5AC5.png :width: 4.1472in :height: 2.5646in .. _RefImage_10000000000002D2000001D634DA637CBB3A5AC5.png: Laminate flooring configuration Material properties ------------------------ Elastic properties of the material ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The mechanical characteristics of the soil model layers that were used are summarized in the table below: .. csv-table:: "**Layer**", "**Sub-layer**", ":math:`\mathrm{vs}(m/s)` "," "," :math:`E(\mathit{Pa})` "," :math:`\rho (\mathrm{kg}/{m}^{\mathrm{²}})` "," :math:`\nu` "," :math:`\xi (\text{\%})` "," :math:`h(m)` "," :math:`b(\text{\%})` "," "," :math:`{N}_{1}`" "1", "1", "184", "2.67 108", "2.67 108", "2650", "0.49", "2.5", "7.6", "5.0", "0" "1", "2", "206", "3.35 108", "3.35 108", "2650", "0.49", "2.5", "7.6", "5.0", "0" "2", "3", "340", "9.21 108", "9.21 108", "2710", "0.47", "2.5", "33.0", "5.0", "0" "2", "4", "417", "1.39 109", "1.39 109", "2.5", "34.0", "5.0", "5.0", "0", "0" "2", "5", "496", "1.96 109", "1.96 109", "2.5", "34.0", "5.0", "5.0", "0", "0" "3", "6", "620", "3.02 109", "3.02 109", "2710", "2710", "0.45", "2.5", "5.50", "5.0", "0" "3", "7", "870", "5.95 109", "5.95 109", "2710", "2710", "0.45", "2.5", "5.50", "5.0", "0" "4", "8", "2500", "4.23 1010", "4.23 1010", "2710", "0.25", "1.0", "-", "2.0", "2.0", "0" The values of SPT (:math:`{N}_{1}`) are provided equal to zero in order to test the computer operation of the macrocontrol only for modeling E with the Byrne model. Shear modulus degradation and damping increase curves ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The three materials (alluvium and two types of marl) have curves of degradation of the elastic modulus G and of hysteretic damping given by the following curves: +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | | | + .. image:: images/1000020100000320000002586167299479DA7395.png + .. image:: images/10000201000003200000025880C244D4D41F880F.png + | :width: 3.3681in | :width: 3.3681in | + :height: 2.5256in + :height: 2.5256in + | | | + + + | | | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Boundary conditions and mechanical loads ------------------------------------------------ Boundary condition ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The boundary conditions applied to the column during the dynamic calculation phase are as follows: * *Bottom of the column*: Assignment of an absorbent border element. If 1D calculation — 1 component: * *Right and left edges of the column*: Periodicity condition. This means that the movements of the nodes on the left and right faces facing each other are made equal. If 1D calculation — 3 components: * *Side edges*: Penalty rate encircling the column, so as to ensure a unique response in horizontal directions (stratified half-space hypothesis) Loading ~~~~~~~~~~ Transient acceleration in the ground given by functions LBNS. If free-field → outcropping rock deconvolution calculation, a coefficient of :math:`1.5` is applied. If flush rock → free field convolution calculation, a coefficient of :math:`0.3` is applied. .. image:: images/100000000000038600000298FD295AE75E99B8D8.png :width: 2.9638in :height: 2.7618in .. _refImage_100000000000038600000298 FD295AE75E99B8D8 .png: